Message boards :
News :
Old Noelia WUs
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have checked the error statistics and they are too high to be normal, so we are going to abort them. They work perfectly over here, so it's not clear what is the problem. We might need to run few in beta to try to understand it. gdf |
![]() Send message Joined: 6 Jun 11 Posts: 124 Credit: 2,928,865 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have put a whole bunch of simulations to replace the cancelled ones on long. It is a system I have been meaning to run more simulations to get more statistics. They should pose no problems, but I'll be keeping an eye on them. As always, please let us know if the case is otherwise. |
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you guys for the very fast intervention. I have 13 of the new NATHAN units processed half way so far, and they are all running just perfectly. Will let you know in exactly 2 hours if they all end succesfull in here. |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 May 10 Posts: 9 Credit: 1,007,421,998 RAC: 27,593 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am very disappointed with this project lately, yesterday NOELIA two units of 8 hours each processed with faulty execution, today NOELIA other two units with 10 hours each processed aborted by the user, this is unacceptable and very little serious. Now I am processing nathan two units, if these errors persist with these units, much lamentadolo definitely fails to process in this project, I'm paying a lot of money on electricity bills with the crisis there, that is useless after this effort. Greetings. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am very disappointed with this project lately, yesterday NOELIA two units of 8 hours each processed with faulty execution, today NOELIA other two units with 10 hours each processed aborted by the user, this is unacceptable and very little serious. I agree with you. Lots of WU problems recently, even on the short queue. I don't know if I'll continue to support this project if these problems keep going. ![]() Team Belgium |
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The new NATHAN units are processing just fine. A small 23,88mb result, 70800 credits, very good ones. |
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 295,172 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I've just reported my first completed one - task 6588199 - on the same host, same settings, same session (no reboot) as the one which failed a Noelia this morning. |
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All my first 13 units where processed without any issue. Second batch is processing. I say we are back on business, i´m glad. |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have put a whole bunch of simulations to replace the cancelled ones on long. It is a system I have been meaning to run more simulations to get more statistics. They should pose no problems, but I'll be keeping an eye on them. As always, please let us know if the case is otherwise. Thanks Nate, want to mention that these NATHAN WUs are running great on my 4 GTX 460 768mb cards too so I think you've done some honing. Thanks again, appreciate it. |
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 10 Posts: 23 Credit: 861,667,631 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Been seeing multiple cases where new WU are not checkpointing (or showing progress in BOINC Manager). Have aborted a couple without improvement. Running on client v7.0.27 under linux x86. |
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yummy, there are some TONYs on the pipe aswell... tasty wu´s, gimme gimme....crunch them all and gladly pay the energy bills when all works like a charm.... |
![]() Send message Joined: 8 Apr 10 Posts: 37 Credit: 4,422,457,619 RAC: 64,437 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Been seeing multiple cases where new WU are not checkpointing Yes I am still having problems in linux also. I thought it was just the NOELIAs but the new NATHANs are doing it also. The tasks will lock up or remain at 0% and the system has to be rebooted for the GPU to work again on any project. Might be the new app, my linux sytems had not needed a reboot in months before this. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Dec 12 Posts: 92 Credit: 225,897,225 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I switched to short ones only and recently got a short NOELIA task which after 24 hours was stuck at 0%. Too bad I was away from the machine and realized it too late. So the short ones are problematic as well. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The short Noelia's run fine on my 550Ti. They take little longer than the previous 4.2 ones (100-200 sec. more) even little more CPU use and less credit 8700 to 10500 previous. Greetings from TJ |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The short Noelia's run fine on my 550Ti. They take little longer than the previous 4.2 ones (100-200 sec. more) even little more CPU use and less credit 8700 to 10500 previous. Yup, crunch "fine" on my GTX 560. I noticed though that they often crash the NV driver and they also show CUDA errors when looking at task details, but they complete fine here and I get valid results ![]() Team Belgium |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Dec 12 Posts: 92 Credit: 225,897,225 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They did run well for few days, but this one: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6583089 was stuck, so I tried to relaunch it and after that I had to abort it. Other computers returned error with this WU too. |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 09 Posts: 114 Credit: 589,114,683 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The short Noelia's run fine on my 550Ti. They take little longer than the previous 4.2 ones (100-200 sec. more) even little more CPU use and less credit 8700 to 10500 previous. Long queue Noelia's run fine on my GTX 460 and my GTX 580 both running 310.70 driver. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The short Noelia's run fine on my 550Ti. They take little longer than the previous 4.2 ones (100-200 sec. more) even little more CPU use and less credit 8700 to 10500 previous. Well, I've disabled long one for the time being as the last 2 long WUs I crunched errored out, so I'm crunching only short ones at the moment. I mostly get short NOELIA and so far, so good. I'm able to report valids ![]() Team Belgium |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 13 Posts: 181 Credit: 144,871,276 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All short NOELIA runs from me with my two GTX 650 Ti GPUs, too: no problems. |
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 47,738 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have put a whole bunch of simulations to replace the cancelled ones on long. It is a system I have been meaning to run more simulations to get more statistics. They should pose no problems, but I'll be keeping an eye on them. As always, please let us know if the case is otherwise. These ran smoothly until yesterday evening when one failed: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6595932 It was the same thing that was happening with the last bunch of TONI units. Today, I had an adventure with this unit: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6600488 It finished successfully, but barely. When it was about 25% done, I got an error message saying that acemd.2865.exe had failed, and the unit wasn't crunching, so I suspended it before I got computation error in boinc manager, the video card's speed and setting were reset (slower speed), and I rebooted the computer, resumed the unit, and it continued to crunch. At 90%+ completion, the computer froze, so I had to unplug it, and restart. It finished successfully! But the subsequent unit refuse to start crunching and the video card speed and settings were reset to a slower speed. I had to suspend that unit and reboot. It is running okay right now, and hopefully it won't crash. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra