Message boards :
Number crunching :
Way to exclude NOELIA tasks?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi, As the title says, is this possible? I have nothing but trouble with NOELIA tasks, both short and long ones, so would like to avoid crunching them as I don't want to babysit my BOINC and look for which works OK and which not. Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 15 May 11 Posts: 108 Credit: 297,176,099 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I too have been having nothing but trouble with NOELIA tasks. On one of my machines (GTX 650 Ti) a task had run for just over 6hrs. I exited BOINC to do something else for about 30 mins, and when I started BOINC back up I immediately got a compute error task ended. After 6 hrs...wasted. I had also seen several of these tasks error out on my other machine, so this morning I started manually aborting them as they downloaded. If possible I'm going to try and stick with TONI tasks. I don't even have this much trouble with NATHAN tasks. Operator |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Both TONI an NATHAN tasks run without problems (short & long queues). Just NOELIA ones are very unpredictable so if someone know how to avoid them, I'd be more than happy. Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Aug 09 Posts: 24 Credit: 156,684,745 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think it's not possible. The only restriction I know of is of excluding short and/or long tasks. |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Jan 09 Posts: 13 Credit: 1,382,704,222 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have de same problem of not having the possibility to babysit the computer. As it crash almost once a day, unfortunately I have to crunch on another project. I'm sorry for that.I will read the forum until a solution has been found. A good idea for the scientists could be to move the unstable tasks in the beta queue which would allow to continue to crunch the other tasks. |
nateSend message Joined: 6 Jun 11 Posts: 124 Credit: 2,928,865 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 15 May 11 Posts: 108 Credit: 297,176,099 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have NOELIAs in my queue on one of my machines again, and another machine is crunching one as I write this. Says it has taken 7:41 so far on the system in progress and estimates 17 more hrs (GTX 650 Ti SSC 2GB) for a system that normally goes through TONIs in around 7-10hrs. I noticed on that machine that instead of using 25-27% CPU (Quad Core 9550) that it was only using 12-13% now. This is new behavior. So are these the "Reloaded" NOELIAs? Kind of catchy, ...NOELIA, She's reloaded, and this time it's personal!! I'm still afraid to pause, or exit from BOINC to do other work in case it errors out with a computational error, especially since it's taken almost 8hrs so far! That would be a waste. Operator |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, NOELIA submitted new WUs on the short 4.2 queue and I've crunched 3 so far and had no problems. They usually crunch in 2.5 hours here and credit is 1500 points. I noticed, though, that they don't fully stress the GPU but I'm OK with that Team Belgium |
Steve Hawker*Send message Joined: 12 Feb 13 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,926,775 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
On one of my machines (GTX 650 Ti) a task had run for just over 6hrs. I exited BOINC to do something else for about 30 mins, and when I started BOINC back up I immediately got a compute error task ended. After 6 hrs...wasted. I had exactly this problem on a Long Task. Except that I was 56 hours into that task. In the FAQ it says: As a general rule, workunits are NEVER canceled when they are running so that you don't lose any credits or compute power. Well, I lost 56,000 points and 56 hours of compute power. Will the admins put in place a scheme to pay us those lost credits? Would sure be appreciated. |
dskagcommunitySend message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 463 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 34 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hum really?? I lost everytime the credits when workunits got canceld o.O DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at
|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Considering that these tasks seem to be able to BSOD a machine and/or fail and afterwards leave them in a state so that subsequent WUs are stuck.. aborting the tasks right now may have saved you (and others) even more trouble. The choice between pest and cholera is always tough. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra