Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new work for cuda 4.2
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). Can't speak for TJ, but me I'm getting short tasks consistently now :) Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). Hello MrS, Yes I get tasks consistently. Directly after I did a clean install of the driver and a reboot I got them (cuda42). They take 25xxx to 26xxx seconds on the 550Ti. No BOINC didn't came with a driver this time (306.97 should do it as it ran beta's (cuda42) consistently. Some off topic information: On another pc with GTX285 I get consistently cuda31 WU's, they run 16xxx to 17xxx seconds. On the 550Ti they took 40xxx seconds. Greetings from TJ |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
TJ, are you getting tasks consistently now, or as erroneous as before the driver update? The driver version really shouldn't cause such behaviour (unless the BOINC log said "driver version xxx too low, please upgrade to at least xxx"). My GTX 560 takes 19xxx to crunch a short 4.2 WU under Linux. Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! Not on my side, though. I didn't change drivers at all but work started flowing after one of the scientists submitted 1000 WUs to the short 4.2 queue. Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for the updates, guys. So in this case it really seemed to be some weird driver issue! And it could be that at the same time I coincidentally did the driver update. Greetings from TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Mar 11 Posts: 509 Credit: 179,005,236 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now that that is settled... we still aren't sure if this server (GPUgrid server) will refuse to send tasks due to the driver on the host being "unacceptable", however you want to define unacceptable. It appears Einstein's server is configured to do so but that doesn't mean this project's server is. Can anybody verify it or think of a quick and easy way to test it? I suppose one could install an unacceptable driver and see if they still receive tasks. In fact I would do such a test but I'm not sure which driver(s) might be deemed unacceptable and I don't want to flail about with guesses. BOINC <<--- credit whores, pedants, alien hunters |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now that that is settled... we still aren't sure if this server (GPUgrid server) will refuse to send tasks due to the driver on the host being "unacceptable", however you want to define unacceptable. It appears Einstein's server is configured to do so but that doesn't mean this project's server is. Can anybody verify it or think of a quick and easy way to test it? I suppose one could install an unacceptable driver and see if they still receive tasks. In fact I would do such a test but I'm not sure which driver(s) might be deemed unacceptable and I don't want to flail about with guesses. My i7, BOINC 7.0.28, GTX285 with driver 280.xx did not get beta's and short runs from CUDA 3.1 and 4.2. BOINC came with the message that I must update my drivers to get new work. Thus 280.xx driver is a good "test" one but in my case with a GTX285. Greetings from TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Aug 11 Posts: 8 Credit: 76,046,994 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. And, come to think of it, why are there two "short" queues? One for 3.1? So are there a bunch of WUs in the 3.1 queue that the server refuses to give me because I can run 4.2 WUs? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The server is configured to check the driver version against its CUDA support level, in order to avoid sending WUs to clients which couldn't execute the corresponding app. That should basically be a simple "if driver > xxx then send work" statement. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. Indeed top is cuda31 and the second is cuda42. This is the same order as on the compute preferences settings. So the 10000+ are the cuda42 ones. The server can see (I think) for which WU the GPU is best. I get only long runs on my GTX285 when I disable all the others. Edit; MrS posted when I was typing... Edit 2, Thanks MrS. Greetings from TJ |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How come one of the "short" queues on the server status page has 10,000+ WUs, but I can't seem to get any of them? I'm running the long WUs fine. Are you sure? According to Nate in the News forum, the top one is the 4.2 queue http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3298&nowrap=true#28658 Team Belgium |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Jun 12 Posts: 297 Credit: 3,572,627,986 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So, were out of long runs now? Any idea when we'll be getting more? |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps there is something not quite good with the server. I got these messages from time to time (when I was not watching the pc): 26/02/2013 16:03:06 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: Requested by project. 26/02/2013 16:03:06 GPUGRID Requesting new tasks for CPU and GPU 26/02/2013 16:03:08 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/02/2013 16:03:08 GPUGRID Message from server: No tasks sent 26/02/2013 16:03:08 GPUGRID Message from server: No tasks are available for Short runs (2-3 hours on fastest card) 26/02/2013 16:03:08 GPUGRID Message from server: No tasks are available for ACEMD beta version 26/02/2013 16:03:08 GPUGRID Message from server: No tasks are available for the applications you have selected. However, when I request manually by clicking the "update" button I almost immediately get new work. Perhaps more people have this "issue"? Greetings from TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Pretty sure as it is mentioned in several posts that the cuda42 is faster then the cuda31. And looking at the server state page and the time WU's are sent back, the fastest must be the cuda42. Or I might have missed something. Greetings from TJ |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I wasn't talking about which is fastest, rather about which queue is which. According to Nate, the 4.2 queue is the top one in Server Status. Team Belgium |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This is all I get: GPUGRID 02-26-13 13:54 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. GPUGRID 02-26-13 13:54 Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPUGRID 02-26-13 13:55 Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks GPUGRID 02-26-13 13:55 No tasks sent GPUGRID 02-26-13 13:55 No tasks are available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Mar 11 Posts: 509 Credit: 179,005,236 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sure, it can say "no tasks available for long runs" in Event Log and then 5 minutes later you receive a long run. One explanation is that there are in fact none available when you request one but a few minutes later someone returns an errored result so then a resend is made available. Or there are none available then someone returns a success result which allows the server to generate a new task based on that success result (since they generate some tasks "on the fly", IIUC). BOINC <<--- credit whores, pedants, alien hunters |
microchipSend message Joined: 4 Sep 11 Posts: 110 Credit: 326,102,587 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra