Performance of 3D Graphic @ PS3GRID
Hi!
This is performance guide of nVidia graphic cards on PS3GRID:
1. GeForce 280GTX: 25000 sec/WU
2. GeForce 260GTX: 28000 sec/WU
3. GeForce 9800GTX+: 44000 sec/WU
4. GeForce 9800GTX: 47000 sec/WU
5. GeForce 8800GTS512: 50000 sec/WU
6. GeForce 8800GT: 58000 sec/WU
7. GeForce 9600GT: 70000 sec/WU
8. GeForce 8800GS: 74000 sec/WU
This is estimated time (+/-2000 seconds ) of what you should expected from this cards when they operate at normal values. This data was taken from statistic of users who crunch. Although this comparison is not 100% correct due to different CPU, and RAM clocks, but this give some lights on GeForce performance.
I will update and correct this when more WU will be completed using 6.43 application.

It seems that for all WU You can get the same points, but deferent’s are in how much time computer needs to completed WU. Overcloacking helps :)

Also different drivers = different performance.

A 8800GS/9600GSO is more powerfull than a 9600GT

Performance of 3D Graphic @ PS3GRID
Hi!
This is performance guide of nVidia graphic cards on PS3GRID:
1. GeForce 280GTX: 25000 sec/WU
2. GeForce 260GTX: 28000 sec/WU
3. GeForce 9800GTX: 47000 sec/WU
4. GeForce 8800GTS512: 50000 sec/WU
5. GeForce 8800GT: 58000 sec/WU
6. GeForce 9600GT: 70000 sec/WU
7. GeForce 8800GS: 74000 sec/WU
This is estimated time (+/-2000 seconds ) of what you should expected from this cards when they operate at normal values. This data was taken from statistic of users who crunch. Although this comparison is not 100% correct due to different CPU, and RAM clocks, but this give some lights on GeForce performance.
I will update and correct this when more WU will be completed using 6.43 application.

It seems that for all WU You can get the same points, but deferent’s are in how much time computer needs to completed WU. Overcloacking helps :)

The Idee to habe a table with performance value is very good, But until now I think we have tooo few results.
I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. It seems I am out of your range?

the gtx+ is faster than a normal gtx so it's normal that it is between normal gts and gtx260 !

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. It seems I am out of your range?

What driver you use?

TO ADMIN ! i NEED ABILITY TO EDIT MY FIRST POST :)
THNX

hmmm what am I doing wrong I have 2 9600gt overclocked (factory) running on 2 Q6600 2.4 quads(Vista 32) and it takes them 19+ hours to complete?

---

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. It seems I am out of your range?

What driver you use?

TO ADMIN ! i NEED ABILITY TO EDIT MY FIRST POST :)
THNX

I have the 6.43 and the nvidia 177.92

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. It seems I am out of your range?

What driver you use?

TO ADMIN ! i NEED ABILITY TO EDIT MY FIRST POST :)
THNX

Are you able to do it? I am able to edit my own posts.

gdf

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. It seems I am out of your range?

What driver you use?

TO ADMIN ! i NEED ABILITY TO EDIT MY FIRST POST :)
THNX

Are you able to do it? I am able to edit my own posts.

gdf

I don't have button - "Edit", and it was written that after 60 minutes i am not able to edit....

hmmm what am I doing wrong I have 2 9600gt overclocked (factory) running on 2 Q6600 2.4 quads(Vista 32) and it takes them 19+ hours to complete?

17 hours for me, 9600GT oc 1900mhz + E4300 @ 2.4ghz on vista64 + 177.84

Are you able to do it? I am able to edit my own posts.

gdf

Hi G!

Normal users only can edit their posts in a 60 minutes time frame.
Only admins/moderators have the ability to always edit their own posts.

---

pixelicious.at - my little photoblog

Are you able to do it? I am able to edit my own posts.

gdf

Hi G!

Normal users only can edit their posts in a 60 minutes time frame.
Only admins/moderators have the ability to always edit their own posts.

Do you know if this can be changed?

gdf

Are you able to do it? I am able to edit my own posts.

gdf

Hi G!

Normal users only can edit their posts in a 60 minutes time frame.
Only admins/moderators have the ability to always edit their own posts.

Do you know if this can be changed?

gdf

No sorry, I don't know. And I've never heard of any project which would have changed that from the default...

---

pixelicious.at - my little photoblog

hmmm what am I doing wrong I have 2 9600gt overclocked (factory) running on 2 Q6600 2.4 quads(Vista 32) and it takes them 19+ hours to complete?

You are not doing anything wrong, it's your card that has only 64 shader units at a clock speed of 1700 MHz.

But amazing to see that the 9600GT from [AF>XTC] ZeuZ which is clocked just 200MHz higher is 2hours faster and only 40min slower that my 9800GT with 112 shaders at 1512Mhz
I think my times are still to slow, but I have no clue why...

hmmm what am I doing wrong I have 2 9600gt overclocked (factory) running on 2 Q6600 2.4 quads(Vista 32) and it takes them 19+ hours to complete?

You are not doing anything wrong, it's your card that has only 64 shader units at a clock speed of 1700 MHz.

But amazing to see that the 9600GT from [AF>XTC] ZeuZ which is clocked just 200MHz higher is 2hours faster and only 40min slower that my 9800GT with 112 shaders at 1512Mhz
I think my times are still to slow, but I have no clue why...

OK thanks. I'll let er run without any more changes.

---

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. > What driver you use?
I have the 6.43 and the nvidia 177.92

Is that on Vista / Vista 64? Because the current Nv driver seems to be faster there. I also run a 9800GTX+ with 6.43 and 177.92 on XP32 and I average about 44.000s with none faster than 44130s (including 6.41).

@Thomasz: how many samples of 260GTX did you see? Because Stefan said his was about as fast as a super clocked 9800GTX here. This could have changed with the new CUDA 2.0 compilers though, as they may make better use of the tweaks in the GT200 architecture.

MrS

---

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

I have a GeForce 9800GTX+ and I have 3 WU with 36.230, 38.266 and 35.527. > What driver you use?
I have the 6.43 and the nvidia 177.92

Is that on Vista / Vista 64? Because the current Nv driver seems to be faster there. I also run a 9800GTX+ with 6.43 and 177.92 on XP32 and I average about 44.000s with none faster than 44130s (including 6.41).

@Thomasz: how many samples of 260GTX did you see? Because Stefan said his was about as fast as a super clocked 9800GTX here. This could have changed with the new CUDA 2.0 compilers though, as they may make better use of the tweaks in the GT200 architecture.

MrS

My above results are on vista 64 and I have an Intel Q6600 overclocked an 3 GHz

Oh boy, this Vista speed advantage is massive! That's ~1300 credits/day more for you, with the same hardware.
(edit: I also have a Q6600 @ 3 GHz - the main difference is the XP/Vista driver)

And it's about 20% faster. That's just the amount of speed which we lost due to the current drivers + CUDA 2.0 compiler, according to GDF. Remember the initial problems nVidia had with their Vista drivers? They arose because they had to write the driver again to fit the new driver model, almost from scratch. Seems like that's finally good for something :p

But buying Vista 64 just because of this driver advantage would be a bit rush right now.
GDF, can you tell us anything more about this? Is NV aware of the issue and are they working on a fix?

MrS

---

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Oh boy, this Vista speed advantage is massive! That's ~1300 credits/day more for you, with the same hardware.
(edit: I also have a Q6600 @ 3 GHz - the main difference is the XP/Vista driver)

And it's about 20% faster. That's just the amount of speed which we lost due to the current drivers + CUDA 2.0 compiler, according to GDF. Remember the initial problems nVidia had with their Vista drivers? They arose because they had to write the driver again to fit the new driver model, almost from scratch. Seems like that's finally good for something :p

But buying Vista 64 just because of this driver advantage would be a bit rush right now.
GDF, can you tell us anything more about this? Is NV aware of the issue and are they working on a fix?

MrS

It is very intresting for me. I am happy to have vista. :-)

GDF, can you tell us anything more about this? Is NV aware of the issue and are they working on a fix?

We have reported the performance problem to Nvidia and are hopeful that a fix will be forthcoming soon.

MJH