Message boards :
News :
New systems in Long queue
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 11 Posts: 166 Credit: 138,629,987 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ok, i raised the transfer limit to 1500,00 MB per day !? will that effect anything ? ok i found this , but will taht help, i even dont understand that. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/JobSubmission |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 09 Posts: 189 Credit: 4,798,881,008 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Two here as well! 20/12/2012 12:30:29 a.m. | GPUGRID | Output file 1x13_10-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND5009_0_4 for task 1x13_10-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND5009_0 exceeds size limit. 20/12/2012 12:30:29 a.m. | GPUGRID | File size: 144107276.000000 bytes. Limit: 128000000.000000 bytes 20/12/2012 11:49:34 a.m. | GPUGRID | Output file 1x31_12-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND4384_1_4 for task 1x31_12-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND4384_1 exceeds size limit. 20/12/2012 11:49:34 a.m. | GPUGRID | File size: 144107276.000000 bytes. Limit: 128000000.000000 bytes And for sure on my other computer failed one as well. Is there a possibility, to identify the WUs GDF has corrected? The failed ones took me over 11 hours to crunch. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Jun 10 Posts: 21 Credit: 10,863,141,443 RAC: 3,504 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ERR_FILE_TOO_BIG -131 Nothing can be done client-side. I don't know if any modifications done server-side (I guess that a restart is needed) will actually reflect on already distributed workunits... [EDIT] I have a wu crunching since ~7 hours and I hope I will not lose it.... I found inside "client_state.xml" some lines about the "name_of_the_wu_4" which is the larger of the output files made while crunching: <max_nbytes>128000000.000000</max_nbytes> will change the value to a much larger one, restart boinc and see what happens... |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 2,863,609,686 RAC: 292 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've just had another one fail at upload!!! :( And a 3rd one :( |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 11 Posts: 166 Credit: 138,629,987 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i wend wrong |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So the situation is this one. All the new WUs SENT after we have made the change this morning are ok. The ones that were already queued in your client before this morning in Barcelona have a 50% probability of failing the upload, so cancel them. gdf Check this file in client_state.xml |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Jun 10 Posts: 21 Credit: 10,863,141,443 RAC: 3,504 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So the situation is this one.or try what I suggested a few posts ago.... |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes do that. gdf |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have a wu crunching since ~7 hours and I hope I will not lose it.... I found inside "client_state.xml" some lines about the "name_of_the_wu_4" which is the larger of the output files made while crunching: <max_nbytes>128000000.000000</max_nbytes> will change the value to a much larger one, restart boinc and see what happens... I did it, and it's working! 1. Exit BOINC manager with stopping scientific applications 2. Locate the client.xml file and open it with a text editor -- On Windows XP: notepad.exe "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC\client_state.xml" -- On Windows 7: notepad.exe "C:\Program Data\BOINC\client_state.xml" 3. Search and replace the <max_nbytes>128000000.000000</max_nbytes> value to <max_nbytes>198000000.000000</max_nbytes> 4. Save and Exit 5. Restat BOINC manager. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 11 Posts: 166 Credit: 138,629,987 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
now it must be right.
<file>
<name>1x29_7-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND2127_2_4</name>
<nbytes>0.000000</nbytes>
<max_nbytes>256000000.000000</max_nbytes>
<status>0</status>
<upload_url>http://www.gpugrid.org/PS3GRID_cgi/file_upload_handler</upload_url>
</file>
Crunshing this task, for sure it will work again. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why are you not using <max_nbytes>0.000000</max_nbytes> ? FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did not even know about it. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ok... i´m new on this beautifull project, and i´m not secure about editing things... But I understand that I can go back to long runs because the ones that are beeing splited now will work without any change? I had a lot of 10/11 hr processing wasted and dont want to loose it all again.. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 57 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I finally got one to upload successfully, after 4 failures, and with 3 more crunching!!! http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6241005 |
dskagcommunitySend message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 463 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 34 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes they are back running, you can crunch on. DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at
|
|
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 11 Posts: 91 Credit: 2,730,095,033 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thank you mate, they are reporting fine now! |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
On 20 Dec 12, GDF wrote... All the new WUs SENT after we have made the change this morning are ok. So, just to make sure, I should be okay having downloaded WU 6224269 on 21 Dec, even though it was created on 19 Dec? Thanks, MarkR |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@ritterm - It should be ok. It's the "sent time" that counts for this issue. You can anyway check the |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@ritterm - It should be ok. It's the "sent time" that counts for this issue. Thanks, Toni. I checked the client_state file and there appear to be numerous files with different <max_nbytes> settings for the WU. Again, just so I'm sure I've got this right, the output file is the one ending in "_4"? If so, I think I'm okay: <file> <name>10x6_4-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND8944_0_4</name> <nbytes>0.000000</nbytes> <max_nbytes>256000000.000000</max_nbytes> <status>0</status> <upload_url>http://www.gpugrid.org/PS3GRID_cgi/file_upload_handler</upload_url> </file> |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Mar 10 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,173,824,416 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I had one of these failures too today: <core_client_version>7.0.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> MDIO: cannot open file "restart.coor" # Time per step (avg over 6250000 steps): 15.773 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 98580.515 s 03:24:41 (23694): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> <message> upload failure: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>1x3_1-NOELIA_hfXA_long-0-2-RND0218_1_4</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> 100,000 seconds of work down the toilet... :( Please fix this! |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra