Message boards :
Number crunching :
Very low credit for Nathan Long Run
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 11 Posts: 147 Credit: 69,970,684 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jan 11 Posts: 13 Credit: 294,225,579 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Your PC was the third one to try to crunch this work unit. The previous 2 computers had tried, but both have had failures. Still all in all, and even considering the time that the Work Unit was sent to the first computer, and the completion time by your PC, the Work Unit was completed in less than 24 hours. I am unable to explain the missing credits. Time for someone else to chirp in. PS-This might help a little, you can see this thread about missing credits; http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=2795#22917 |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 11 Posts: 147 Credit: 69,970,684 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
thanks for that link :) It was pretty close to 24 hours from when the workunit was sent to the first computer. but since neither of them actually completed it, I'm not sure that it is the same issue..... |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra