Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problem of misassignment of cuda4.2 vs cuda3.1 tasks
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 21 Dec 08 Posts: 51 Credit: 26,320,167 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Did you try a project reset? |
StoneagemanSend message Joined: 25 May 09 Posts: 224 Credit: 34,057,374,498 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Were sent 3.1 tasks at 7:58 UTC & 8:32 UTC. No more so far. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Oct 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 5,879,292,399 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Look promising. No mixed task so far. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Haven't received any more on my 570 |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've received a CUDA3.1 task today on one of my hosts. However, my hosts receive much less CUDA3.1 tasks lately (btw most of them are turned off because we have a heatwave here in Hungary). |
StoneagemanSend message Joined: 25 May 09 Posts: 224 Credit: 34,057,374,498 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Doh! Just received a 3.1 task at 21:19:29 UTC. |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just got a 3.1 a few hours ago. Thanks - Steve |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Guys, if this is acceptable, then I would stay happy with it. The boinc scheduler has its own personality with many conditionals. gdf |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This problem can be handled on the cruncher's side with my workaround. GDF, I just want to be sure... Could it generate any problems if I crunch the CUDA3.1 tasks with the CUDA4.2 client? (as my workaround works this way) |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yea I got one (3.1) on my 570 again. Or course it always sneaks in when I'm sleeping. I too would like to know if the workaround is acceptable. I will be putting it in place later myself with your permission GDF. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
what is the percentage of 4.2 that you get compared to 3.1? 95% or much less? gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 from the last 20 for me. So presently 90% Prior to that (~2nd July) it was closer to 50/50. - checked a few other peoples systems and that seems to be about right. I think Boinc may periodically chose to run the 3.1 tasks in order to reconfirm that 4.2 is still faster and most stable (or not). Being generic Boinc code, on some projects some tasks may run faster on one app than another app; depending on the system and the tasks type. Of note, the performance of some x86 and x64 tasks my vary relatively from one system to another, and some apps might become more stable or less (statistically) when running different task types... Just got my first 3.1 in a while. Of course it had to be a short one! FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok, that's fine for me. Hopefully we will also remove the cuda3.1 app soon at least for long tasks. gdf |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra