Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
Cuda 4.2 WUs seem much faster than the old 3.1
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 21 Dec 08 Posts: 51 Credit: 26,320,167 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is it just me or is the cuda 4.2 WUs 30-40 percent faster than the 3.1s are. It seems amazing the difference is so extreme. Also, is it a good time now to get a 680 ? now that the project will support it ?? |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is it just me or is the cuda 4.2 WUs 30-40 percent faster than the 3.1s are. It's much faster on every host. It seems amazing the difference is so extreme. It is amazing, but it will vary among different wourkunits. Also, is it a good time now to get a 680 ? now that the project will support it ?? Definitely! |
dskagcommunitySend message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 463 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 31 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
every host? i still get app 3.1 wus on the 285gtx O.o is it because cc1.3? or must i reattach? on the 560ti i got 4.2 and i was supprised it done a short WU in 4 hours (before i think it was 5,5h?), so nice speed there ^^ DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at
|
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The improvement is very noticeable on the normal length tasks, and certainly more than the expected 15% improvement. However it does vary considerably, from task to task! I'll quote myself from here:
IBUCH_3_affTRYP ~23% faster PAOLA_3EKO ~36% faster MJHARVEY_MJHXA1 ~56% faster
FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
Carlesa25Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi: All tasks are downloaded 4.2 CUDA GTX295 mistake on my Ubuntu 12.04-64bit driver 295.59 the CUDA 3.1 are working perfectly. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
process exited with code 247 (0xf7, -9) This might result from a missing/incompatible Library file. Check if there are any updates. Is anyone else having this problem? I know there are a few people with Kernal/driver mismatches: process exited with code 255 (0xff, -1) </message> <stderr_txt> Error: API mismatch: the NVIDIA kernel module has version 295.40, but this NVIDIA driver component has version 295.53. Please make sure that the kernel module and all NVIDIA driver components have the same version. Perhaps there is a general problem with CC1.3 cards and the 4.2app on Linux? FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Or a problem in some Linux driver packages? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 2,863,609,686 RAC: 265 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Switched to cuda4.2 units for today.... so far 2 completed units and 3 have failed exit code - 98 (0x62) |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you updated the driver after starting a task, that task will probably fail. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 2,863,609,686 RAC: 265 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you updated the driver after starting a task, that task will probably fail. Been running the updated driver for a couple of weeks and 3.1 tasks (long) have been running ok. Now had 6 failures and 2 completed. My crunchers will be going offline whilst I jet off for a family holiday. Will see how things run when I get back. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now had 6 failures and 2 completed. The CUDA4.2 failures could be caused by overclocking adjusted for CUDA3.1 tasks. My GTX 480s need 25mV more for crunching CUDA4.2 tasks without failures, also my GTX 590s had to be set to 625MHz instead of 725MHz (I don't want to raise their voltage). |
Carlesa25Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi, I reinstalled the Nvidia 295.59 driver without problem, the OS works perfectly and the GTX295 is two tasks normally CUDA 3.1.ACEMD2 We'll see if any task more CUDA 4.2. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 2,863,609,686 RAC: 265 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now had 6 failures and 2 completed. Will try fiddling around with settings when I return from holiday. If the long queue is switching to CUDA4.2 I'll try and get the cruncher stable on shorties first. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Carlesa25Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I still have errors in CUDA 4.2, Nvidia driver 302.17 installed new, not GTX295 OC. CUDA 3.1 is working perfectly Error: "process exited with code 247 (0xf7, -9)" |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Jul 11 Posts: 166 Credit: 138,629,987 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i am here with XP and 301.42, still getting errors with 2x 460 GTX. Now its some new on cuda 4.2 PAOLA, a bluescreen, tell that: nv4_disp 0x000000EA 0x89788770 0x89FC06C8 0xB84DBCBC 0x00000001 Could that say someting !? Edit: ok, raised the voltage by 25mV, now waiting and watching. ok 30 minutes , and no error. yeepee !!! |
dskagcommunitySend message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 463 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 31 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No one answered me for some days now, hope it was only a overreading ^^ Are the cuda 42 apps only for fermi&kepler, because i get only cuda31 apps (yes i tested short WUs) on my 285gtx or must i reattach this machine? (what i must time right because its a unattended machine) DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at
|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You're running driver: 301.42, so this shouldn't be an issue. Maybe you selected one the queue which doesn't have the new app yet? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
Carlesa25Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
4.2 CUDA tasks keep getting error on my GTX295 Linux. Can anyone confirm if they only work the FERMI and KEPLER ... is to avoid wasting time, yours and mine. Thank you. |
dskagcommunitySend message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 463 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 31 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I tried both long and short. So this shouldnt the problem. But ok it seems there are still some probs with cuda 42 apps when i read the threads and i need valid results not wasting time :) only wanted to try one if it works or not as info for the team. DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at
|
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra