Seems there is not lot difference between running a GTX 480 or a GTX 680 on cuda 4.2 , at this time, i think. Will that be improved in future ?

The test WU is a very small system and the additional overhead of Win 7 is probably enough to hide the performance benefit. On a nice Linux system, however, the 4.2 app on 680 should have ~1.6x over a 480, even on these WUs.

MJH

Been looking for that tick for awhile now and still can't find it....

Here's a link to my page though.?

http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?userid=86780

EDIT: After a bumpy start had about 60 in a row that were all 4.2

No Access :(

Go To
GPUGRID preferences

Change the fifth option down to,
Should GPUGRID show your computers on its web site? yes

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Changed it. Surprised I missed that... Ran about 5-7 seconds longer with other cores being used for WCG. So 60-61 WCG suspended amd 65-67 with it running on 6 threads I believe. Oh and RZ, mine apparently had swan sync =0 working as well. Didn't change any settings manually.

There is more CPU usage at the start and finish of the GPU tasks, so the performance of longer tasks might differ. I expect they would be less effected by running CPU tasks (especially when using 6threads from 8). So having 2 free or 8 free might make very little difference for the normal GPUGrid tasks on the 4.2app.
Worth checking again though; some presumptions may have to change when the apps changes.

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

ID 31329 XP 64bit GTX560Ti CC2.1, driver 301.42, Swan_Sync NOT set
6.46 CUDA4.2 run times 101 - 107s
6.46 CUDA4.0 run times 224 - 226s

ID 96212 W7 64bit GTX260 A.2 (65nm), driver 295.73, Swan_Sync set
6.46 CUDA4.2 run times 298 - 316s
6.46 CUDA4.0 run times 499 - 502s

Good job guys

http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=3492000

Look this one, an error. Thought it will be over :(