Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
New beta application for kepler is out
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Christopher HerrSend message Joined: 1 Apr 10 Posts: 13 Credit: 106,905,353 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A first tentative version for windows is out. Seems to, I let exactly 20 of the beta tasks run with stock settings and they all validated: http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=120909&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=21 Tell me, if you can use the link, please! Win 7 Pro x64, i7 870 @2.93GHz, ASUS P7P55D-E, 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP and most important two Gigabyte NVidia GeForce GTX 680 OC 2GB and Forceware 301.24. BOINC 7.0.27 x64. Runtimes around 60 seconds, as you can see, load was around 80% when tasks were running. |
StoneagemanSend message Joined: 25 May 09 Posts: 224 Credit: 34,057,374,498 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Strange things with XP32. Gets to around 20% complete then starts again 296.10 & 7.0.25UPDATE: sorted. Anti-virus disabled Now finishing in ~65s with OC 570 |
nenymSend message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,429,587,071 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Host ID 31329 (Win XP 64bit, GTX560Ti CC2.1, driver 301.24 - switch off disabled, BM 6.10.58). Beta 6.43 task errored out at beginning. http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=5384427. Part of the stderr <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741676 (0xc0000094) </message> <stderr_txt> Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Integer Divide by Zero (0xc0000094) at address 0x00411BDD Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...Factory OC 900MHz UCed to 890 MHz. EDIT: The same on 833 MHz. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,734,645,728 RAC: 274,927 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A first tentative version for windows is out. So far so good. http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=74707 Though the computer seems sluggish and slow, when they are running. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A first tentative version for windows is out. It's working on GTX 590, GTX 580, GTX 480 too. Win XP x64, drivers 301.24, and 296.10. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jan 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 15,297,622 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
More than 60 tasks all successfully done with the Windows client. I'm seeing a real world run time of 56 seconds each, though the reported time is nearly 10 seconds higher: http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?userid=14933&offset=0&show_names=0&state=3&appid= |
Christopher HerrSend message Joined: 1 Apr 10 Posts: 13 Credit: 106,905,353 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone of those having problems ever thought about upgrading BOINC to latest from http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl, perhaps? BTW it is working good also on a GTX480 @825 core with ForceWare 296.10 under Win 7 Pro x64. :) |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seems to be working for me too. 2003R2_x64 Boinc 7.0.27 NVidia 301.32 driver, GTX470@680MHz: 5384721 3428411 17 May 2012 | 12:50:55 UTC 17 May 2012 | 13:00:55 UTC Completed and validated 95.73 93.95 150.00 ACEMD beta version v6.43 (cuda42) 5384590 3428282 17 May 2012 | 12:45:13 UTC 17 May 2012 | 12:50:55 UTC Completed and validated 98.22 93.33 150.00 ACEMD beta version v6.43 (cuda42) GPU Utilization is 99% - Christopher Herr [TeaM], you link worked! Spear, your link didn't work =# FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
W7 Home Premium on both & SAME CLOCKS and same drivers 301.40: i7 3820@4.3, 680@1200 w/ memory@3100 running 7 WCG tasks= GPU utilization at 85% averaging around 64 seconds. When running 0 WCG tasks, GPU utilization at 91%=60s i7 2500k@4.2, 670@1200 w/ memory@3100 running 3 WCG tasks= GPU utilization at 90% averaging around 65s So clock for clock at same GPU utilization and roughly same CPU clocks, the 670, on these betas, and at both 90%, the difference is around -10%. EDIT: Managed to get 2 energies have become nan while OCing, to see how fast I could get them. What's interesting is that nothing changed in runtimes, seemed to hit a wall at 57-58 seconds on mine. I prefer leaving these cards around 1200 anyways. But no problems here, good job guys |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Suspend/resume works fine (20% and 80% checkpoints as on Linux). Also stopped it ran another task, resumed... No problems thus far. Looks like a GTX670 on W7 is on par with a GTX570 OC on WinXP_x86. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Also just tried them on the 302.59 drivers, which have support for CUDA 5, and they worked perfectly. Roughly same speeds |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have put some more WUs out. What are the suggested drivers then for Windows and Linux? gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
GDF, I received some new beta-wu 6.43. They all causes all other boinc-mgr-jobs to start all over again. Regards, Ton (ftpd) Ton (ftpd) Netherlands |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Mar 10 Posts: 147 Credit: 1,077,535,540 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi all ! Please, would you be kind enough to recall, everytime you post, the configuration you are using i.e. : OS type and version GPU(s) type(s) and driver(s) version(s) Greetings Lubuntu 16.04.1 LTS x64 |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As far as Windows drivers go, I can say that I have had no issues MYSELF with either 301.40 and 302.59 (alpha CUDA 5 dev driver). I have not had any issues with any driver in the 301.xx range for Einstein@home either for my 670&680. NVIDIA is supposed to be releasing a new WHQL very soon, possibly before the real app is released for this project. If a WHQL or new beta is released before then, I will try it and post results. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 12 Posts: 411 Credit: 2,083,882,218 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Newest driver official driver from NVIDIA is coming out next week (don't know if it's just Windows or not) http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=218060&st=220 Will test them then GDF |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Using windows-xp-pro driver 301.24 gtx480 Ton (ftpd) Netherlands |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Dec 08 Posts: 51 Credit: 26,320,167 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have noticed my computer is very unresponsive when running the Beta units. Win 7 x64, GTX570, 301.25 nvidia driver, 3770k CPU, Sabertooth X77 Motherboard. Besided the slowdown beta is running great on my system. Over 300 of them now last i looked. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have put some more WUs out. Whatever works! For GTX600 cards on Windows I suggest 301.34 or above. I think drivers prior to these do not support the GTX690 and GTX670. These drivers support CUDA 4.2.1. For GTX600 cards on Linux I suggest 295.53. This driver supports the following cards: GeForce GTX 690, GTX 680, GTX 670, GT 645, GT 640, GT 630, and lesser non-recommended cards. For GTX500/GTX400 cards, just whatever is stable for you and supports CUDA 4.2. Actually the 295 and 296 drivers only support CUDA 4.1.1 but have been demonstrated to run these Beta's. 296.10 is WHQL, but that stamp is pretty much meaningless. So I would recommend a more recent driver. On XPx64 with a GTX470 I have tested everything from a 295 driver up to 301.34, and the tasks all ran. There may however be issues with some of these drivers, and I have noticed glitchy performance related to the GPU downclocking during periods of non-crunching. On Linux I was able to run the Beta's using 295.40 (Ubuntu 12.04 repository, Boinc daemon install) on a GTX470, but others expressed problems with that Boinc setup. Anyway, that driver and up supports the Beta app. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 10 Credit: 104,093 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Running GTX 680 using Nvidia 301.24 drivers on Win7 Pro 64-bit. Managed to successfully download and run some ACEMD beta version 6.43 work. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra