Message boards :
Wish list :
ATI Cards?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
the 3xxx and 4xxx series are cheaper and run faster than the PS3, will they ever be supported? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the 3xxx and 4xxx series are cheaper and run faster than the PS3, will they ever be supported? Unlikely, for sure not before the end of next year. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 08 Posts: 15 Credit: 36,207,656 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
the 3xxx and 4xxx series are cheaper and run faster than the PS3, will they ever be supported? So See folding@home ON http://folding.stanford.edu for the moment they use a 32bits process to crunch with some ATI card, i use it on my pc: q9550 / 2Gb DDR2-8500 / HD4850 512Mb and at the same time boinc 6.2.18 (in a service), but folding use 1 of my 4 cores and one core is used for 2 WU of boinc in same time .. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Aug 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Worse yet. I just went and downloaded the new Catalyst drivers 8.8 for my HD3850. In the release notes (https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206/0/www2.ati.com/gamesite/Catalyst_88_release_notes.html) I found this: ATI's Folding@Home It's a shame. (Or doesn't that worry you?) Jord. BOINC FAQ Service |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 08 Posts: 15 Credit: 36,207,656 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
on my P5E-Q9550-Win64-4 Gb DDR2-8500 / boinc 6.2.18-HD4850 512Mb catalyst 8.8, folding : - gpu no success, but i will try soon under boinc 6.3.10 - cpu ok, but it take for one of my four core, and in boincmgr 2 wu on 4 core are used half on the same core. i notice too the ccc=catalyst control center) and viewer failed sometime. |
Aleksander ParkitnySend message Joined: 30 Sep 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 116,798 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Half of the world is using ATI graphic cards. Isn't it worth to use that computing power also?? Guys from FAH already made it. I would realy like to participate in Your project but with my ATI card i am unable to do it. So i stick to the BOINC and wait for You guys to develop ATI client |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Dec 07 Posts: 19 Credit: 53,126 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Maybe this email from ATI might interst you (forwarded yesterday to boinc_projects@ssl.berkeley.edu by Dr. Anderson): -------- Original Message -------- Peter |
Aleksander ParkitnySend message Joined: 30 Sep 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 116,798 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Any status update on this case guys? There are milions of ATI cards out there just waiting to be used. |
Stefan LedwinaSend message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 298,573,998 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
GDF the project admin already said that it is unlikely, and for sure not in the next year. (See the 2nd post in this thread) The CUDA app is still in beta and we try a few things. Also the CUDA capable BOINC clients still have some bugs that needs more work from the devs. It doesn't help if someone asks every few weeks... ;) pixelicious.at - my little photoblog |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Nov 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
I'm also willing to use my ATI to join your project. You can count on me if the port is ever done. I'll keep an eye just in case. Meanwhile, i'll keep on crunching WU on IBERCIVIS and folding@home... jordi |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Nov 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
hello ATI Stream comes on 10 December 2008 with Catalyst 8.12 http://www.computerbase.de/news/hardware/grafikkarten/ati/2008/november/ati_stream_jedermann_dezember/ In English: http://translate.google.de/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.computerbase.de%2Fnews%2Fhardware%2Fgrafikkarten%2Fati%2F2008%2Fnovember%2Fati_stream_jedermann_dezember%2F&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en can you Support it? I will Crunch with my HD4870! Thanks |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We will not support ATI for the time being. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Mar 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Good news to the ATI fans!! The next version of BOINC (6.8) they will add support to the ATI GPUs. They put it on the Roadmap with this Note: "The turn around for this release is expected to be pretty quick". So.. we need to wait a little more! http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/roadmap |
Paul D. BuckSend message Joined: 9 Jun 08 Posts: 1050 Credit: 37,321,185 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The only project with a known ATI application right now is Milky Way. And then only for the 38x0 and 48x0 cards. MW may be doing an OpenCL or CUDA version of their application also. The ATI application is not that well integrated and there are issues with running it right now. Einstein@Home has indicated that they have a GPU application in the works, but the information is more confused as to which version will be first on the block. The way I read the post they have several of the APIs in development with maybe the CUDA application in the lead. If and when OpenCL matures and we get a couple applications done with it, well, then we will know if it is better to build native or use the more portable API ... |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Dec 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
I just do not see why there is only one project that runs the ATI structure. It really seems a waste of time to exclude a significant amount of people from using very powerful cards to do work. This is not just aimed at GPU grid but the projects in general. I do run MW@H now, but quite frankly am getting sick of it because there is hardly any work. I consider myself lucky if I get a total or 20-30 minutes running time per day. I am fully aware that F@H also runs the ATI apps, but I have issues with how F@H is run and how they portray themselves to the other projects and even their members. They have been considered the 'bastard exiled stepson' of boinc for many years and I refuse to support them. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The reason that no other project is using ATI card at the moment is that they are not ready. You can port only very simple applications or you have to let them do the port for you. Their hardware is moving towards better computation, but it still not there. It's not just peak performance, you need to be able to use those flops in a sensible way. For ATI, we need to wait for OpenCL and see how they perform then. gdf |
Aleksander ParkitnySend message Joined: 30 Sep 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 116,798 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Guys from F@H did it. Guys from MilkyWay managed to do it. They didn't wait for OpenCL they just took advantage of the fact that half of the people is using ATI gpu based cards, and theese cards are just running idle, just waiting for some work. Just look at the statistics fo MilkyWay computing power. And they are not able to provide the WUs for all those ATI cards. So there is plenty of room for other projects. Folding proteins on ATI is possible and the F@H proved it. So there is no excuse like: "The reason that no other project is using ATI card at the moment is that they are not ready. You can port only very simple applications or you have to let them do the port for you. Their hardware is moving towards better computation, but it still not there. It's not just peak performance, you need to be able to use those flops in a sensible way. For ATI, we need to wait for OpenCL and see how they perform then." The folding simulation is quite complexed one and as seen in F@H, ATI cards are capable of running such app without OpenCL. If F@H could do that, why can't You?? Maybe You should cooperate a little bit closer with guys from ATI? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We contacted ATI. We are waiting for a decision, long due now. For MW is a very simple application, for F@H ATI wrote the code, as far as I know. gdf |
Aleksander ParkitnySend message Joined: 30 Sep 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 116,798 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Any news Guys? Pepole with ATI cards are crunching MW Wu's like crazy and there is a lot of computing power still left. For CUDA there are several other projects so there will be more competition for CPU cycles (recently AQUA joined with GPU app) |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Feb 09 Posts: 139 Credit: 575,023 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Guys stop asking for support for ati cards. Just accept the choice from the project admins not all projects benefit from the ati cards. We just need to be patient a bit more since more and more people want to contribute with their hardware, i just hope every project admin takes the time to see if its possible to do so on another brand of gpu. If they don't then accept it and move on, lets show some respect to their choice. If the choice is made we make the choice which we are going to help out, remember we are the ones paying the electric bill not them ;) But i accept the choice made from every project admin The only project which need to be pushed towards gpu work is CPDN ;), those guys simply to lazy to rewrite their crappy old fortran code ;) |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra