Message boards :
Number crunching :
New 'long' workunits in queue
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A new batch of 'long' workunits are out, named SMDTRYP5LONG. They are approximately 4 times as long as the usual ones. |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi Toni, Can you confirm that these WUs each represent 20 ns of simulation and if these are running at the new high utilization rate? If they are 20 ns and the typical entire run length is 500 ns (like older runs are) there would only need to be 25 WUs in a chain instead of 100? I would imagine these long (really long) WUs provide substantial overall efficiencies due to not only the app efficiency but also fewer turnovers between WUs and because they are "opt in" only, likely it will only be high ends cards crunching them and they should still return within 24 hours. I'll be turning GPUGrid back on when I get home tonight. :thumbsup: Thanks - Steve |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm crunching two of these right now. Both are running on GTX 480 at 72-75% GPU usage (SWAN_SYNC=1, CPU at 4GHz). They will finish earlier than I expected: 2h27m 43.2%, 4h53m 86.1% |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
> Can you confirm that these WUs each represent 20 ns of simulation Almost: these TRYP5LONGs had a preliminary 10 ns of simulation time, and no WU turnaround - I just needed those 10 ns per run. (This will change of course) Longer WUs indeed are a huge bonus for us, because overall latency is much shortened. For example, for TRYP5LONGs, i just need to wait for one result per chain rather than four in a row. Special thanks to all the "long" crunchers, then. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Jan 11 Posts: 31 Credit: 70,061,988 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks like the long workunit queue is running low. Will you repopulate it, or is this just a test run for you? |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Make sure your systems are setup to also run short tasks. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The long runs will be more sporadic than the short ones. gdf |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The "If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications?" option is not working (from the "Preferences for this project" section). |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think you should en masse uncheck the "ACEMD for long runs of 8-12 hours on fastest GPU" option for users with low RAC. I'm crunching a bunch of these long WUs previously failed on some older card. This is a waste of time, elecricity and computing power as it is now. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The "If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications?" option is not working (from the "Preferences for this project" section). It's kinda strange. Now it seems to be working. I received these error messages until now: 2011.03.02. 3:22:54 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 2011.03.02. 3:22:54 GPUGRID Requesting new tasks for GPU 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Message from server: No work sent 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for ACEMD beta version 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Message from server: ACEMD beta version is not available for your type of computer. 2011.03.02. 3:22:56 GPUGRID Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your preferences on the web site. 2011.03.02. 3:23:31 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 2011.03.02. 3:23:31 GPUGRID Requesting new tasks for CPU and GPU 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Message from server: No work sent 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for ACEMD beta version 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Message from server: ACEMD beta version is not available for your type of computer. 2011.03.02. 3:23:32 GPUGRID Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your preferences on the web site. 2011.03.02. 3:24:36 GPUGRID update requested by user 2011.03.02. 3:24:37 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 2011.03.02. 3:24:37 GPUGRID Requesting new tasks for CPU and GPU 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Message from server: No work sent 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for ACEMD beta version 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Message from server: ACEMD beta version is not available for your type of computer. 2011.03.02. 3:24:38 GPUGRID Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your preferences on the web site. But now it's look like this: 2011.03.02. 5:43:44 GPUGRID Finished upload of R600-TONI_SMDTRYP5LONG-0-1-RND6708_1_4 2011.03.02. 5:43:44 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. 2011.03.02. 5:43:44 GPUGRID Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU and GPU 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: No work can be sent for the applications you have selected 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for ACEMD beta version 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: No work is available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: ACEMD beta version is not available for your type of computer. 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: Your preferences allow work from applications other than those selected 2011.03.02. 5:43:46 GPUGRID Message from server: Sending work from other applications 2011.03.02. 5:43:48 GPUGRID Started download of F375-TONI_SMDTRYP5-0-LICENSE I swear that I didn't change anything in my preferences since my previous post. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you should en masse uncheck the "ACEMD for long runs of 8-12 hours on fastest GPU" option for users with low RAC. I'm crunching a bunch of these long WUs previously failed on some older card. This is a waste of time, elecricity and computing power as it is now. Is there a way to at least prevent CC1.1 and CC1.2 users from selecting long tasks, to make it CC1.3 and Fermi only? - Though that wouldn't help this guy's GTX295, this guy's GTS450 or this guys GTX460. They seem to work on the high end (GTX465, 470, 480, 570 and 580) cards better. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We could make it fermi only, but then people might complain. gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Then as Zoltan suggests, a strickter allocation based primarily on task completion success rate would be the way forward; no-one wants tasks failing after 8 to 12h. I also think that the option to run other tasks if long WU's are not available should be fixed at selected when people subscribe to the long tasks: Run only the selected applications ACEMD standard: no ACEMD beta: yes ACEMD for long runs of 8-12 hours on fastest GPU): yes If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications? yes [set at yes when long runs=yes] |
silent FloatSend message Joined: 13 Jul 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 5,626,566 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We could make it fermi only, but then people might complain. Complaint !! My GTX460 OC (GF104) -> for "long runs" 50'500 sec. -> NO ERRORS There are many computers with GTX275, GTX280, GTX285 without errors and much better RunTime , between 35'000 and 50'000 sec. I hope you do not close access for "long runs" to all these GPU. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Don't worry, all it's going to stay open. gdf We could make it fermi only, but then people might complain. |
nenymSend message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,429,587,071 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
RUN time 35,545.84 CPU time 35,059.03 claimed 38,584.72 granted 57,877.08 GTX560Ti WinXP 64bit, Swan_Sync=0, driver 26726, GPU load 95%, time per step 14.190 ms. Host ID 31329. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra