On new fatty WUs

Message boards : News : On new fatty WUs
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

AuthorMessage
Profile JohnMD
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 26,860,106
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 19805 - Posted: 8 Dec 2010, 11:00:05 UTC - in response to Message 19783.  

After about 4 days your efforts become worthless to the project and might even slow it down. After 5days you don't even get any credit. Personally I would prefer this credit cut-off was 4days, to better reflect the reality of the situation.

My 7-year old desktop finally hit the dust, and now I have a replacement with a CUDA-card! So without reading the small print I attached to gpugrid. 4½ days later my WU completed - and now I learn that I'm probably wasting the projects time.
So maybe it's good idea to shorten the deadline to prevent GT218-hopefuls like me getting in the way :-)
ID: 19805 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19807 - Posted: 8 Dec 2010, 12:18:02 UTC - in response to Message 19805.  

Your NVidia ION only has 16 cuda cores, it is well short of the recommended minimum of 96 cuda cores.
Although your ION can finish some tasks within 5days, the task was reissued after 2days to a GTX260 and returned 2days before your task, making your efforts redundant.

http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=2135446

As you can see the GTX260 is 10times as fast as an ION.

Consider using your Ion on Einstein, and your CPU cores on WCG's HCMD2 or HCC projects.
I see you run FreeHal. You could also run WorkUnitProp.

Good luck,
ID: 19807 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19881 - Posted: 13 Dec 2010, 0:21:01 UTC - in response to Message 19748.  

For this, we will grant 40% BONUS in credits with the *long* WUs. We'll do it through a command we have never used that will be tested over the weekend. If successful, we will use it for ALL NEW *long* SUBMISSIONS starting NEXT WEEK.

Looks like those never used before commands are still not working.
I've just completed another *_long_* monster wu, normal 50% bonus been applied on it.
ID: 19881 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ignasi

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 08
Posts: 254
Credit: 16,836,000
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19887 - Posted: 13 Dec 2010, 16:17:37 UTC - in response to Message 19881.  
Last modified: 13 Dec 2010, 16:19:22 UTC

Looks like those never used before commands are still not working.
I've just completed another *_long_* monster wu, normal 50% bonus been applied on it.


Hi Retvari Zoltan,
This WU you are linking is actually a from a batch that is two weeks old, about to finish: 9 of 10 steps completed. By new ones submitted this week we meant brand new long batch submissions.
Which I am about to do in the next couple of days.

Thanks,
ignasi
ID: 19887 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19890 - Posted: 13 Dec 2010, 21:21:26 UTC - in response to Message 19887.  

By new ones submitted this week we meant brand new long batch submissions.
Which I am about to do in the next couple of days.

Ok. I can't wait to meet those :)
ID: 19890 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ignasi

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 08
Posts: 254
Credit: 16,836,000
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19900 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 12:55:42 UTC - in response to Message 19890.  

First batch of 500 is out.
*IBUCH_AcPYEEIP_long*

With a 40% extra bonus.

happy crunching
i
ID: 19900 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ignasi

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 08
Posts: 254
Credit: 16,836,000
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19901 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 13:58:39 UTC - in response to Message 19900.  
Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 14:10:20 UTC

First batch of 500 is out.
*IBUCH_AcPYEEIP_long*

With a 40% extra bonus.

happy crunching
i


Negative.
We encourage you to discontinue any IBUCH_AcPYEEIP_long.
They will compute well but the experiment is not correct.

My fault. I appologise.
ID: 19901 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ignasi

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 08
Posts: 254
Credit: 16,836,000
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19902 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 14:16:27 UTC - in response to Message 19901.  
Last modified: 14 Dec 2010, 14:26:39 UTC

We have cancelled all UNSENT WUs for the wrong batch.
We won't force cancel any running WU (only 230 running now), they should complete fine as normally. However, we discourage their continuation.

Correct ones will be issued in few hours with a new bonus for all will be now of 50%.
ID: 19902 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 19905 - Posted: 14 Dec 2010, 14:50:58 UTC - in response to Message 19901.  

First batch of 500 is out.
*IBUCH_AcPYEEIP_long*

With a 40% extra bonus.

happy crunching
i


Negative.
Please discontinue any IBUCH_AcPYEEIP_long.

They will compute well but the experiment it is not correct. It is wasted computing. And we all hate that.

My fault. I appologise.

I didn't mean to rush you in any way.
I've aborted 2 of those.
ID: 19905 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Message boards : News : On new fatty WUs

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra