Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
ACEMD2 CUDA3.1 is now out
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,739,145,728 RAC: 116,723 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The IBUCH_ _pYEEI units are also slower on my computer. |
|
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 402,550,664 RAC: 49,936 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Got anybody any of these new v6.09 WUs? Hi, yes, today I updated to cuda 3.1, resetted the project. A couple of minutes later the download of all necessary files started. For abaout half an hour I received messages, that I have a wrong system, that a fermi-GPU is required aso. But then - surprise, surprice - a 6.09WU started. Right now my old GTX260 is crunching it. Usually it faild after ~16%, now it reached 18% .. and it is still working! I will give an update, whether it finished or failed. Regards, Alexander |
|
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 402,550,664 RAC: 49,936 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No reason to be happy, wu failed after ~2 hours. So CUDA3.1 + old 260 : Sorry, the problem is still there! Regards Alexander |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We can reproduce the problem so we can probably fix it. We know where is the problem. It is due to a change of data structure in CUDA3.1 which seems to be very bad in most cases. A fix is on its way, but it might require a couple of days. Be patient in the meanwhile. gdf |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's a problem of a routine in cuda3.1. We have patched it for now. New application release coming up. gdf |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have found a very bad bug in CUDA3.1. I have removed the CUDA3.1 application until we can see the extent of the problem. gdf |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe NV will fix it in CUDA3.2 :) I hope they will release it in a month. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Are there any news about that very bad bug? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On a machine with a mixed Fermi/g200 installation of cards, results on g200 for the FFT are simply wrong. This is a really bad bug. The only solution is to deliver the CUDA3.1 application to Fermi cards only. gdf |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
New application is out for test in beta. Only fermi cards can get the cuda31 app due to the cuda3.1 bug. This version maintains the level of performance of cuda3.1 for all workunits. gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Picked up two, both failed in about 1 sec! 2599077 1651913 15 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC Error while computing 1.45 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31) 2598716 1651698 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC 15 Jul 2010 14:40:05 UTC Error while computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31) Name 100-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND4717_0 Workunit 1651913 Created 1 Jul 2010 8:39:18 UTC Sent 15 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC Received 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC Server state Over Outcome Client error Client state Compute error Exit status -40 (0xffffffffffffffd8) Computer ID 71363 Report deadline 20 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC Run time 1.453125 CPU time 0 stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.56</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -40 (0xffffffd8) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 470" # Clock rate: 1.41 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 1341718528 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 14 # Number of cores: 112 SWAN: Using synchronization method 0 SWAN : Module load result [.nonbonded.cu.] [200] SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0 Granted credit 0 application version ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 (1279MB) driver: 25721 Operating System Microsoft Windows XP |
|
Send message Joined: 22 May 10 Posts: 20 Credit: 85,355,427 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Same results on my GTX 470...immediate failure Sorry i can't post the error details ATM but I am fairly sure they identical to skgiven's |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This one also failed, 2598612 1651618 15 Jul 2010 14:40:05 UTC 15 Jul 2010 16:10:07 UTC Error while computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31) They are not even starting, SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Removed, tomorrow another one. gdf |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Trying now with acemdbeta 6.32 for windows. gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ran one Beta task. It worked on my GTX470 on XP x86, Boinc ver. 6.10.56 Cant find it online yet! Here are the Boinc details: 16/07/2010 15:00:29 GPUGRID Starting 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0 16/07/2010 15:00:30 GPUGRID Starting task 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0 using acemdbeta version 632 16/07/2010 15:05:22 GPUGRID Computation for task 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0 finished 16/07/2010 15:05:23 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_0 16/07/2010 15:05:23 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_1 16/07/2010 15:05:31 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_0 16/07/2010 15:05:31 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_2 16/07/2010 15:05:36 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_1 16/07/2010 15:05:36 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_3 16/07/2010 15:05:47 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_2 16/07/2010 15:05:47 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_7 16/07/2010 15:05:51 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_7 16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_3 16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. 16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Reporting 1 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks 16/07/2010 15:05:53 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed GDF, see here too - http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=2227&nowrap=true#17998 |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,739,145,728 RAC: 116,723 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just finished 3 of these beta units, they all came out completed and validated. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
These beta WUs are failing on the GTX 460: <core_client_version>6.10.57</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -40 (0xffffffd8) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using device 0 # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 460" # Clock rate: 0.81 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 774307840 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 7 # Number of cores: 56 SWAN : Module load result [.fastfill.cu.] [200] SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed </stderr_txt> While the clock speed is also incorrect above, it's reported correctly by MSI Afterburner v1.61. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The beta's are working well for GF100 cards, just not for GF104 cards (GTX460). The scientists are now aware of the problem because Beyond reported a difference in Compute Capability between the cards; CC2.0 for GF100 cards, CC2.1 for GF104 cards. GDF said they will try to create a new Beta for the GTX460 on Monday. So check back Monday evening. Apparently the GTX460 works on Collatz. Those wanting to test their card & tune the fans for a nice low temps, you could figure it out there. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra