ACEMD2 CUDA3.1 is now out

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : ACEMD2 CUDA3.1 is now out
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,739,145,728
RAC: 95,752
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17867 - Posted: 4 Jul 2010, 12:29:25 UTC

The IBUCH_ _pYEEI units are also slower on my computer.
ID: 17867 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Werkstatt

Send message
Joined: 23 May 09
Posts: 121
Credit: 402,550,664
RAC: 40,964
Level
Gln
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17871 - Posted: 4 Jul 2010, 19:24:38 UTC - in response to Message 17809.  

Got anybody any of these new v6.09 WUs?

Hi,
yes, today I updated to cuda 3.1, resetted the project. A couple of minutes later the download of all necessary files started. For abaout half an hour I received messages, that I have a wrong system, that a fermi-GPU is required aso.
But then - surprise, surprice - a 6.09WU started. Right now my old GTX260 is crunching it. Usually it faild after ~16%, now it reached 18% .. and it is still working!
I will give an update, whether it finished or failed.

Regards,
Alexander
ID: 17871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Werkstatt

Send message
Joined: 23 May 09
Posts: 121
Credit: 402,550,664
RAC: 40,964
Level
Gln
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17872 - Posted: 4 Jul 2010, 20:05:39 UTC - in response to Message 17871.  


I will give an update, whether it finished or failed.

No reason to be happy, wu failed after ~2 hours.
So CUDA3.1 + old 260 : Sorry, the problem is still there!

Regards
Alexander
ID: 17872 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17877 - Posted: 4 Jul 2010, 23:15:53 UTC - in response to Message 17866.  

We can reproduce the problem so we can probably fix it.
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=2209&nowrap=true#17865

gdf


We know where is the problem. It is due to a change of data structure in CUDA3.1 which seems to be very bad in most cases.
A fix is on its way, but it might require a couple of days.
Be patient in the meanwhile.

gdf
ID: 17877 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17886 - Posted: 5 Jul 2010, 14:25:54 UTC - in response to Message 17877.  

It's a problem of a routine in cuda3.1. We have patched it for now.
New application release coming up.

gdf
ID: 17886 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17892 - Posted: 5 Jul 2010, 17:17:12 UTC - in response to Message 17886.  

We have found a very bad bug in CUDA3.1. I have removed the CUDA3.1 application until we can see the extent of the problem.

gdf
ID: 17892 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17894 - Posted: 5 Jul 2010, 21:58:24 UTC - in response to Message 17892.  

Maybe NV will fix it in CUDA3.2 :)
I hope they will release it in a month.
ID: 17894 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17952 - Posted: 14 Jul 2010, 12:08:33 UTC - in response to Message 17892.  

Are there any news about that very bad bug?
ID: 17952 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17976 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 13:47:41 UTC - in response to Message 17952.  

On a machine with a mixed Fermi/g200 installation of cards, results on g200 for the FFT are simply wrong. This is a really bad bug.

The only solution is to deliver the CUDA3.1 application to Fermi cards only.

gdf
ID: 17976 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17978 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 14:14:06 UTC - in response to Message 17976.  
Last modified: 15 Jul 2010, 14:14:47 UTC

New application is out for test in beta. Only fermi cards can get the cuda31 app due to the cuda3.1 bug.
This version maintains the level of performance of cuda3.1 for all workunits.

gdf
ID: 17978 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17980 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 14:42:58 UTC - in response to Message 17978.  
Last modified: 15 Jul 2010, 15:21:14 UTC

Picked up two, both failed in about 1 sec!

2599077 1651913 15 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC Error while computing 1.45 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31)
2598716 1651698 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC 15 Jul 2010 14:40:05 UTC Error while computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31)

Name 100-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND4717_0
Workunit 1651913
Created 1 Jul 2010 8:39:18 UTC
Sent 15 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC
Received 15 Jul 2010 14:36:31 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error
Exit status -40 (0xffffffffffffffd8)
Computer ID 71363
Report deadline 20 Jul 2010 14:35:06 UTC
Run time 1.453125
CPU time 0
stderr out

<core_client_version>6.10.56</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -40 (0xffffffd8)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 470"
# Clock rate: 1.41 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 1341718528 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 14
# Number of cores: 112
SWAN: Using synchronization method 0
SWAN : Module load result [.nonbonded.cu.] [200]
SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed


</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 0
Granted credit 0
application version ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 (1279MB) driver: 25721
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
ID: 17980 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
coldFuSion

Send message
Joined: 22 May 10
Posts: 20
Credit: 85,355,427
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17982 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 15:06:50 UTC - in response to Message 17980.  
Last modified: 15 Jul 2010, 15:07:24 UTC

Same results on my GTX 470...immediate failure

Sorry i can't post the error details ATM but I am fairly sure they identical to skgiven's
ID: 17982 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17986 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 16:29:51 UTC - in response to Message 17982.  

This one also failed,
2598612 1651618 15 Jul 2010 14:40:05 UTC 15 Jul 2010 16:10:07 UTC Error while computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- ACEMD beta version v6.30 (cuda31)

They are not even starting,
SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed
ID: 17986 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17993 - Posted: 15 Jul 2010, 21:43:58 UTC - in response to Message 17986.  

Removed, tomorrow another one.
gdf
ID: 17993 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 17997 - Posted: 16 Jul 2010, 13:29:28 UTC - in response to Message 17993.  

Trying now with acemdbeta 6.32 for windows.

gdf
ID: 17997 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17999 - Posted: 16 Jul 2010, 14:12:56 UTC - in response to Message 17997.  
Last modified: 16 Jul 2010, 14:36:18 UTC

Ran one Beta task. It worked on my GTX470 on XP x86, Boinc ver. 6.10.56
Cant find it online yet!
Here are the Boinc details:

16/07/2010 15:00:29 GPUGRID Starting 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0
16/07/2010 15:00:30 GPUGRID Starting task 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0 using acemdbeta version 632
16/07/2010 15:05:22 GPUGRID Computation for task 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0 finished
16/07/2010 15:05:23 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_0
16/07/2010 15:05:23 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_1
16/07/2010 15:05:31 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_0
16/07/2010 15:05:31 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_2
16/07/2010 15:05:36 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_1
16/07/2010 15:05:36 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_3
16/07/2010 15:05:47 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_2
16/07/2010 15:05:47 GPUGRID Started upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_7
16/07/2010 15:05:51 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_7
16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Finished upload of 63-GIANNI_TESTDHFR7-1-5-RND3683_0_3
16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks.
16/07/2010 15:05:52 GPUGRID Reporting 1 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks
16/07/2010 15:05:53 GPUGRID Scheduler request completed


GDF, see here too - http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=2227&nowrap=true#17998
ID: 17999 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,739,145,728
RAC: 95,752
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 18009 - Posted: 16 Jul 2010, 22:16:59 UTC

I just finished 3 of these beta units, they all came out completed and validated.
ID: 18009 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Beyond
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 08
Posts: 1112
Credit: 6,162,416,256
RAC: 0
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 18011 - Posted: 16 Jul 2010, 22:49:21 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2010, 22:51:04 UTC

These beta WUs are failing on the GTX 460:

<core_client_version>6.10.57</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -40 (0xffffffd8)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using device 0
# There is 1 device supporting CUDA
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 460"
# Clock rate: 0.81 GHz
# Total amount of global memory: 774307840 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 7
# Number of cores: 56
SWAN : Module load result [.fastfill.cu.] [200]
SWAN: FATAL : Module load failed

</stderr_txt>

While the clock speed is also incorrect above, it's reported correctly by MSI Afterburner v1.61.
ID: 18011 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 18020 - Posted: 17 Jul 2010, 9:08:41 UTC - in response to Message 18011.  

The beta's are working well for GF100 cards, just not for GF104 cards (GTX460). The scientists are now aware of the problem because Beyond reported a difference in Compute Capability between the cards; CC2.0 for GF100 cards, CC2.1 for GF104 cards. GDF said they will try to create a new Beta for the GTX460 on Monday. So check back Monday evening. Apparently the GTX460 works on Collatz. Those wanting to test their card & tune the fans for a nice low temps, you could figure it out there.
ID: 18020 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 18023 - Posted: 17 Jul 2010, 11:25:25 UTC - in response to Message 18020.  

GTX470 on XP running a Beta:
2678845 1704781 17 Jul 2010 8:32:57 UTC 17 Jul 2010 11:05:25 UTC
Completed and validated 280.06 276.80 187.28 280.92 ACEMD beta version v6.32 (cuda31)
ID: 18023 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : ACEMD2 CUDA3.1 is now out

©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra