Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
New app acemd 6.72 for Windows
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have uploaded the newest application to replace the old application. So now we have: acemd 6.72 newest app WIN (cuda2.2 and cuda3) acemd2 6.03 production application WIN/LINUX (cuda2.2) acemdbeta newest app (cuda2.2 and cuda3) WIN (not used now) Linux cuda3 coming soon (Monday). gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any changes important for us in 6.72? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Jun 08 Posts: 152 Credit: 328,250,382 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can these app also been used for fermi-cards? Ton (ftpd) Netherlands |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
and how do the versions map to our preference options? ACEMD ACEMD ver 2.0 ACEMD beta Thanks - Steve |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
acemd 6.7x ACEMD acemd2 6.0x ACEMD ver 2.0 acemdbeta ACEMD beta |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any changes important for us in 6.72? 6.72 is 30% faster on 1.2 compute capability cards. Also if the there is not enough GPU RAM it should not request the memory but same speed as before. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can these app also been used for fermi-cards? All the cuda30 should work on Fermi cards, but in practice we saw that they don't. We will check why as soon as we receive the first Fermi card. gdf |
X-Files 27Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 95 Credit: 68,023,693 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I getting a message that there is no workunit for this app.
|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's possible. We have so many on the production application, that for now we can't create more. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Mar 10 Posts: 9 Credit: 837,920 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
Finally got one of the 6.71 WUs http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2180296, ran about 22% slower than 6.03 WUs on this machine as feedback, thanks, |
|
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 10 Posts: 45 Credit: 103,429,292 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is any app based on 6.22 beta? Which one amongst apps is shorter for WIN? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Finally got one of the 6.71 WUs http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=2180296, ran about 22% slower than 6.03 WUs on this machine as feedback, thanks, Indeed, we are looking at 6.72 here. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Mar 10 Posts: 9 Credit: 837,920 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
haha..woops didn't realize the 2 vs 1, blame it on being tired I guess. |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Mar 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 16,186,927 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
did the linux app come out today as planned? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
no, we are waiting for the Fermi card at this point. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How much GPU RAM does it need? |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Apr 08 Posts: 254 Credit: 16,836,000 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am submitting internal tests and production WUs to new ACEMD 6.72 app. They are *_long_100420*. As already explained in other threads, they are of the *long* batch that is twice as long as usual. Regarding performance, do you see improvements over previous *long* running on acemd2 6.03? |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can you just clarify which cards should crunch these 6.72 application dependant tasks? I am thinking, CC1.1 cards that fail ACEMD Ver. 2 tasks, possibly CC1.2 cards but I still think ACEMD Ver. 2 would be faster, and possibly Fermi cards (better chance of working and perhaps aiding development) Not CC1.3 cards or CC1.1 cards that always succeed with ACEMD Ver 2. tasks. Thanks, |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This application will become the new production application if it passes the test. So everyone who is running now can run these ones. For Fermi we are waiting for the delivery of the first cards. gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK everybody will be able to run 6.72 tasks, but should they? Is the 6.72 application replacing the ACEMD (Ver 1 app)? Is it replacing 6.03? Will 6.72 be as fast as ACEMD Ver 2 for all cards? Will a GTX275, for example, work as fast on 6.72 as on 6.03? Thanks, |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra