Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why are these WUs failing?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why are these WUs failing? |
SaengerSend message Joined: 20 Jul 08 Posts: 134 Credit: 23,657,183 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why are these WUs failing? You have to link them to your host, as links for users results are only valid for the user him/herself. As you only have one host, and that one not hidden, it wasn't that hard to guess ;) Just to show yo, here are mine: user and host. Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HTH you could try updating your cards drivers. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HTH you could try updating your cards drivers. Oh, yes. I just installed my card and I have been using the drivers that came with the card. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I updated the drivers. Now it seems to work allright. Thanks! |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How many minutes should the ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics 6.03 (cuda) WU last? I am using Nvidia GTX 275 card and the latest drivers. Currently: 20 minutes and only 4%. Is this ok? Does the checkpointing work? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes that's fine. The time elapsed for prcentage done is not linear. Checkpointing does work. When and if the unit completes you will be able to get the time per step for the unit and compare it to another machine that has done a similar unit on the same card. Post it here and someone will tell you. Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station. Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team - Radio Caroline |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 4,307,023 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How many minutes should the ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics 6.03 (cuda) WU last? I am using Nvidia GTX 275 card and the latest drivers. Currently: 20 minutes and only 4%. Is this ok? That is about the time you might expect. Does the checkpointing work? Yes it does. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes that's fine. The time elapsed for prcentage done is not linear. Checkpointing does work. Completed. Run time: 30,100.93 seconds, CPU time: 10,587.66 seconds. Does it look normal to you? My card is ASUS GTX 275. HTH. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 38 Credit: 6,365,573 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How many minutes should the ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics 6.03 (cuda) WU last? I am using Nvidia GTX 275 card and the latest drivers. Currently: 20 minutes and only 4%. Is this ok? Great to know. It took a bit over 8 hours to finish that WU. Is it normal? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Here are the details someone will be along soon to tell you if it's normaal because i don't have a 275 :( m1-IBUCH_501c_pYEEI_100304-22-80-RND5562_0 # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 275" # Clock rate: 1.40 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 924188672 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 30 # Number of cores: 240 # Time per step: 44.541 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 27838.123 s EDIT TO ADD: Just had a look at your system and think it would be faster if you had a faster CPU and more than 2GB of RAM but otherwise looks normal for that system. The CPU is needed to feed the GPU. Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station. Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team - Radio Caroline |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra