Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
New beta 6.15
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have been working on optimizing further the application. There is a new Linux application out which is able to actively select the device architecture. Speed for compute capability 1.2,1.3 should be higher now. At least two digits percent improvements. Windows application is under internal testing. GDF. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It still takes the whole CPU core by default. After manual "renice" it looks as it should in my opinion. Will see how about speed in this version. From Siberia with love!
|
[AF>Libristes] DudumomoSend message Joined: 30 Jan 09 Posts: 45 Credit: 425,620,748 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've had one: No CPU time improvement but 12% faster on my GPU (GTX275) than the 6.04. Not bad !!! |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very good. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've got a 6.15 beta in the cache with about 3.5 hours to go on a production WU. Is it preferable to suspend the production WU and run the beta immediately or take it in order? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Beta app 6.15 WU f113-TONI_KK20BETA-5-100-RND3209_1 successfully completed but only about 3% faster than an app 6.04 equivalent. CPU usage same as app 6.04. Some improvement anyway. I have another beta waiting to start in about 3 hours. Platform: Phenom II x4, 4GB, Fedora 11, GTS-250 1GB, 6.10.17 |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GTS-250 is based on the G92 GPU core, so it does not gain anything from the new application. Only G200 cores run faster. gdf |
[AF>Libristes] DudumomoSend message Joined: 30 Jan 09 Posts: 45 Credit: 425,620,748 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've had one: I had another one. I confirm the speed improvement. (10-12% on my GTX275) |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
GTX275, ubuntu 9.10 x64. CPU usage is the same (100%), although no doubt it's faster than 6.04 Guys, could you pls look closer on CPU usage?
|
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It will be very useful even if someone could just provide a way to make GPU apps run at lowest priority (so as CPU apps) without necessarity to modify it's priority manually... From Siberia with love!
|
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
me personally put GPUGRID at reasonably high priotiry (I wanna get more points, ha-ha). But 100% CPU usage killing my CPU-based POEM project...
|
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's exactly what I am talking about... From Siberia with love!
|
nenymSend message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,431,087,071 RAC: 64,039 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
6.15 A69-TONI_KKBETA2-0-100-RND8994_0 task errored out after 10 hours ID 64724 - 9600GT, Ubuntu 64bit, 100% load of one core <core_client_version>6.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> # There is 1 device supporting CUDA MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # There is 1 device supporting CUDA SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [PmeRealSpace_compute_forces_kernel] [702] acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda: swanlib_nv.cpp:221: void swanRunKernel(const char*, block_config_t, block_config_t, size_t, ...): Assertion `0' failed. SIGABRT: abort called Stack trace (14 frames): ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(boinc_catch_signal+0x4d)[0x46265d] /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f3a67e2a040] /lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x7f3a67e29fb5] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x183)[0x7f3a67e2bbc3] /lib/libc.so.6(__assert_fail+0xe9)[0x7f3a67e22f09] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x46ff13] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x45b6eb] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x458a54] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x4294b0] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x41292c] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sin+0xbf2)[0x407ffa] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sin+0x3b4)[0x4077bc] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x7f3a67e155a6] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sinh+0x51)[0x407519] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra