Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
The new application is out (acemd2)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Palmss, you probably need to update your driver. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 2 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Palmss, you probably need to update your driver. Why are the new applications being sent out under plan_class (cuda), instead of (cuda23), if they need the new drivers? You're only sending out cufft.dll.2.2 and cudart.dll.2.2: those should be OK with 185.85 driver, shouldn't they? |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The nomenclature is wanting, as is the application version numbering system, however it will simplify soon; we are presently using up the last of the old tasks. So very shortly we will only be left with the (Up to 60% faster) ACEMD - GPU molecular dynamics tasks (ACEMD ver 2.0), and occasional Beta work. What is the minimum CUDA/driver version Required to run these New tasks? PS. A few days ago I did get one error on a GT240 (SWAN: FATAL : swanMalloc failed). It is very rare that I get any errors on these devices; but it was application version 6.01. I am now using NVidia’s most up to date Beta and overclocking five GT240s with no problems. Name3-GIANNI_BIND_650-79-100-RND5157_0 Workunit1170404 Created16 Feb 2010 9:20:51 UTC Sent16 Feb 2010 9:20:51 UTC Received16 Feb 2010 18:05:49 UTC Server stateOver OutcomeClient error Client stateCompute error Exit status-40 (0xffffffffffffffd8) Computer ID63357 Report deadline21 Feb 2010 9:20:51 UTC Run time16100.420681 CPU time1031.166 stderr out <core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -40 (0xffffffd8) </message> <stderr_txt> # There are 2 devices supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 # Device 1: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # There are 2 devices supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 # Device 1: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 # There are 2 devices supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 # Device 1: "GeForce GT 240" # Clock rate: 1.53 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 12 # Number of cores: 96 SWAN: FATAL : swanMalloc failed |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seems that I should post it in this thread... Strange error while WU processing with 6.06 application (Linux). What's wrong? From Siberia with love!
|
|
Send message Joined: 12 Feb 09 Posts: 57 Credit: 23,376,686 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't see a speedup on this computer: http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=50946 what's wrong? on my 9600GT I clearly see a speed increase of a bit over 50% |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is clearly a speedup it's just not so pronounced. Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station. Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team - Radio Caroline |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You also are trying to compare two different WU types. The TONIs use to take quite a bit more than the IBUCHs, take a look at the point differential. Thanks - Steve |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Aug 08 Posts: 7 Credit: 60,897,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks I installed the 196.21 version and it works very well :) |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra