Should it be checking report date on start up?


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Should it be checking report date on start up?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
_Jim_

Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 08
Posts: 7
Credit: 175,308
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 948 - Posted: 8 Mar 2008, 16:48:27 UTC

I have a wu that is running for 111 hours. That is not the poroblem it is 3 day past due I was playing a game yesterday so on start up it should have been 2 days past due. I will be aborting the wu when I turn it back on right now I am going to play R6:V.
ID: 948 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 960 - Posted: 10 Mar 2008, 11:20:34 UTC - in response to Message 948.  

I have a wu that is running for 111 hours. That is not the poroblem it is 3 day past due I was playing a game yesterday so on start up it should have been 2 days past due. I will be aborting the wu when I turn it back on right now I am going to play R6:V.


Yes abort. In particular if it is called TIM3.
ID: 960 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Should it be checking report date on start up?

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra