Message boards :
Number crunching :
Full-atom molecular dynamics for Cell processor 5.03
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Bender10Send message Joined: 3 Dec 07 Posts: 167 Credit: 8,368,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HOLY Crap!!! That TIM3 wu (#15017), finally finished successfully. 45.6 hours. Here is the Task data (again) http://www.ps3grid.net/result.php?resultid=19218. At least it finished.... It shows a message (error?) in the middle of the stderr out file. <core_client_version>5.10.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> ENC # number of SPEs used 6 B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel ..... B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel FILE_LOCK::unlock(): close failed.: Bad file descriptor called boinc_finish ENC # number of SPEs used 6 B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel B no 0 ./restart.coor ./restart.vel ..... </stderr_txt> EDIT: It almost looks like it ran twice the normal time due to an error at the end of a normal run?? Consciousness: That annoying time between naps...... Experience is a wonderful thing: it enables you to recognize a mistake every time you repeat it. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HOLY Crap!!! I will check on this. Thanks for letting it run. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HOLY Crap!!! YES. There is a problem. Restart does not work properly. If you run it continuously it should work, but if you suspend it, it starts from the beginning. I will patch it now. |
UL1Send message Joined: 16 Sep 07 Posts: 56 Credit: 35,013,195 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
WU14776 ran for about 56 hours with zero % progress and 24 hours of remaining time, before I restarted it. But again only the calculation time is running and the other two indicatoirs seem to be stuck. Should I abort this WU? Deadline is nearing... |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
WU14776 ran for about 56 hours with zero % progress and 24 hours of remaining time, before I restarted it. But again only the calculation time is running and the other two indicatoirs seem to be stuck. Should I abort this WU? Deadline is nearing... Yes please. See the thread on workunits *TIM3*. g |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra