Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
New nvidia beta application
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
RealSantaSend message Joined: 17 Aug 07 Posts: 9 Credit: 347,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
Hi, til yet 32,5h (94%) done . ... hope the last minutes are also successfull on the 9600M GT. btw: a lot faster then the old app.. so you can edit the list of supported GPU's because the deadline is NOW no problem! Best RS |
RealSantaSend message Joined: 17 Aug 07 Posts: 9 Credit: 347,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
Update. successfully done: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=1818728 Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 37854 Report deadline 10 Feb 2010 8:15:45 UTC Run time 124240.524799 CPU time 4816.328 stderr out <core_client_version>6.6.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce 9600M GT" # Clock rate: 1.25 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 4 # Number of cores: 32 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # Device 0: "GeForce 9600M GT" # Clock rate: 1.25 GHz # Total amount of global memory: 536870912 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 4 # Number of cores: 32 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # Time per step: 198.761 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 124225.814 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> One question: what happens/means here: " MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" " ? best RS |
Michael GoetzSend message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 124 Credit: 124,873,744 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's normal. I believe it's stating that it can't find a checkpoint file, therefore it's starting from the beginning. This will always happen when starting a WU for the first time. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The beta is running great here on 4 different types of cards: GTX 260, GT 240, 8800 GT and 9600GSO. My BIG problem is having to abort a boatload of v6.71 WUs in order to get the v6.08 ones. Any chance of making this easier on us? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We will move this beta to a standard acemd2 application as soon as possible. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 2 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We will move this beta to a standard acemd2 application as soon as possible. Fine by me: reporting successful completion of a IBUCH_1000smd_pYEEI with the Beta app and a 9800GTX+. |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Completed 2 successfully on a GTX275 with 196.21 drivers. Link to wu 1 here and wu 2 here And 2 more on a GTX295 with 196.21 drivers Link to wu 1 here and wu 2 here Also are we going to try the cuda 2.3 DLL's (ie plan class cuda23)? I don't think they will offer any speed advantage but you never know. BOINC blog |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
MarJ - can you tell us a little about the macine/ os/ drivers/ anything else going on on your PC with the 295? Looking at the processing time / time per step for the two WUs you posted was painful ... Time per step: 95.802 ms I have found that when two betas are running at the same time on the same 295 the processing is very slow and it looks like your machine is having the same issue. Any details you have might help provide some insight. Thanks - Steve |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Linux beta application uploaded. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Linux beta application uploaded. what I need to do? I changed "Run test applications?" to "yes" but still WUs for 6.70 app.
|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wait... for the right one. Linux beta application uploaded. |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wait... for the right one. ok, let's wait
|
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The beta is running great here on 4 different types of cards: GTX 260, GT 240, 8800 GT and 9600GSO. Now up to 33 successful v6.08 WUs on 5 cards (GTX 260, GT 240, 8800 GT, 9600GSO and another GT 240). Still only the single error mentioned above and I think that was caused by something not related to GPUGRID (another project had put out some bad WUs and the bad CPU WU crashed pretty much everything including the GPUGRID WU). I think v6.08 is more stable than v6.71, and that wasn't bad. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Linux beta application uploaded. Got one. 19 min = 0.704% Is it OK? GTS250, Ubuntu 9.10 x64, 195.30. From Siberia with love!
|
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I also got one. Later 2day there will be results.
|
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1h01m - 2.704% only. Is it ok?
|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For a GTX275 it seems quite slow. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
For a GTX275 it seems quite slow. 2h41m - 9.024%. Something wrong... my GTX275 is OC'd @702/1584/1260 upd.: sorry, I cancelled that WU... 3 hours and 10%...
|
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
8 hr, 12% (GTS250). Will it be finished untill the deadline?.. From Siberia with love!
|
|
Send message Joined: 23 Feb 09 Posts: 39 Credit: 144,654,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
For a GTX275 it seems quite slow. Reboot after every driver-crash! If the problems do not disappear: Deinstall old drivers via windows, then boot into safe-mode, run Guru3d driver sweeper, reboot, and install the new drivers. |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra