Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
GTX285 slower on Windows7!
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
heya, my GTX285 is running slower on Windows 7 64bit! on XP i had 30-40 ms per step and now i got 45-over50 ms per step! what could be the reason of this? just AERO ??? thanks in advance |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Are you sure that you are comparing workunits with the same name? gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just did that and i compared two GIANNI-BIND(?) WUs on Xp i had 35ms/step and on win7 46ms/step :| |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
their are certain background effects in windows 7 that eat up just a little bit of the resources of the card... my computer, system properties, advance system settings, advance, performance, choose what you want to see and not see under visual effects. this may help. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
zpm, ty for ur reply, but I dont really get what u want me to change !? :D could u explain it more detailed please? |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
the visual effects in windows has the option to be put on custom, performance, and quality, it's most likely set to quality. try performance to see if the time steps go up. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
oh, Ive found it, well lets see what it changes.. for now it looks like XP cuz i turned off everything :o |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually nothing changed, completed another GIANNI-BIND WU and still 47ms/step :| |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually nothing changed, completed another GIANNI-BIND WU and still 47ms/step :| specify the differences between the 2 systems. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
no difference its same system just before it was win XP SP3 32bit and now its W7 64 bit |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
in task manager, bump the priority up to high. idk, it could be a number of things, client version, to many programs running, something could be slowing it,... |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just did that and i compared two GIANNI-BIND(?) WUs on Xp i had 35ms/step and on win7 46ms/step :| Because of your post I checked my results and see something similar happening. On my GTX 260 the GIANNI-BIND WUs went from 42ms/step to 46ms/step when I switched from XP-64 to W7-64, compute time went up from 27k to 30k per WU. My Win 7 has Aero turned off, 4GB ram, set to performance instead of appearance. All other projects that I've checked (except this one) show comparable performance in XP-64 and W7-64. Collatz, MilkyWay, NFS, Virtual Prairie, PrimeGrid 321 Sieve, Docking, and Leiden are the ones I've checked and they all show no slowdown. Wonder what's going on? |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
zpm, i tested my old Xp boinc 6.5.0 and this now 29.10.2009 04:17:30 Starting BOINC client version 6.6.38 for windows_x86_64 booth the same no difference. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
zpm, i tested my old Xp boinc 6.5.0 and this now 29.10.2009 04:17:30 Starting BOINC client version 6.6.38 for windows_x86_64 Here's your XP-32 machine with a GTX 285: # Time per step: 44.423 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 28874.760 s http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=1393869 Here's your Win7-64 machine with a GTX 285: # Time per step: 46.260 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 30068.907 s http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=1441435 Looks like the XP-32 machine was probably using an older driver too (not specified for some reason). Not as big a difference as we're seeing though... Edit: Your Win7 machine also used 2.5 times the CPU time. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just did that and i compared two GIANNI-BIND(?) WUs on Xp i had 35ms/step and on win7 46ms/step :| Edit: The CPU usage is also consistently double in Win 7 compared to what it was in XP for the same type WUs. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
so all in all W7 seems to be bad for boinc? :< |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
so all in all W7 seems to be bad for boinc? :< As stated above, GPUGRID is the only project of the ones I've checked (Collatz, MilkyWay, NFS, Virtual Prairie, PrimeGrid 321 Sieve, Docking, and Leiden) that shows this slowdown in Win 7. What we'd like to find out is why and how it can be corrected. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So lets hope some GPUGRID Staff member see's this and forwards this problem of W7! |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So lets hope some GPUGRID Staff member see's this and forwards this problem of W7! If this slowdown only happens in GPUGRID maybe it's not a Win 7 problem, but a project app programming or compiling problem? |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Feb 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 2,017,436 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well I dont know, all I can say if there wont be any solution all I can do is switch to another project then =) had to do the same with my GTX260 was like the 1st here that started to error out all WUs when thoose 2.0(?) WUs came and it once had 18k RAC R.I.P :-D well lets see what happends and if something will be done |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra