Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
acemdbeta erroring out
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 27 Credit: 1,000,618,568 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It looks like recently that my machine started to use the "acemdbeta" instead of the usual "acemd", which had been running fine. The computation seems to fail out each time; errors below. I've made no recent changes to my GPU, GPU driver, BOINC, or OS: OS = Fedora 11, 2.6.30.6_x86_64 kernel GPU driver = x86_64 Kernel Module 185.18.36 GPU = GeForce 9600 GSO BOINC = 6.6.37 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu 13-Sep-2009 15:03:34 [GPUGRID] Starting p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 13-Sep-2009 15:03:34 [GPUGRID] Starting task p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 using acemdbeta version 602 13-Sep-2009 15:03:45 [GPUGRID] [error] Can't rename output file p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_5 to projects/www.gpugrid.net/p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_5: Error -1 13-Sep-2009 15:03:51 [GPUGRID] [error] Can't rename output file p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_7 to projects/www.gpugrid.net/p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_7: Error -1 13-Sep-2009 15:03:51 [GPUGRID] Computation for task p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 finished 13-Sep-2009 15:03:51 [GPUGRID] Output file p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_1 for task p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 absent 13-Sep-2009 15:03:51 [GPUGRID] Output file p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_2 for task p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 absent 13-Sep-2009 15:03:51 [GPUGRID] Output file p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_3 for task p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3 absent 13-Sep-2009 15:03:52 [GPUGRID] Started upload of p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_0 13-Sep-2009 15:03:52 [GPUGRID] Started upload of p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_6 13-Sep-2009 15:03:58 [GPUGRID] Finished upload of p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_0 13-Sep-2009 15:03:58 [GPUGRID] Finished upload of p40000-IBUCH_random_pYEEI_1009-0-5-RND3455_3_6 |
K1atOdessaSend message Joined: 25 Feb 08 Posts: 249 Credit: 444,646,963 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It looks like recently that my machine started to use the "acemdbeta" instead of the usual "acemd", which had been running fine. The computation seems to fail out each time; errors below. It's a Linux beta task. Given these are beta WU's, you shouldn't expect them to work 100%. The error rate in these should be greater than the non-beta WU's. There is an option in the GPUGrid preferences to elect not to receive beta WU's if you don't want some failed WU's. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 27 Credit: 1,000,618,568 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's a Linux beta task. Given these are beta WU's, you shouldn't expect them to work 100%. The error rate in these should be greater than the non-beta WU's. There is an option in the GPUGrid preferences to elect not to receive beta WU's if you don't want some failed WU's. Understood. I intentionally selected the option to run "test" applications and I don't have a problem with a few blowing up. However, every WU has errored out almost immediately in this fashion since the new acemdbeta was downloaded, so I wanted to make sure it was reported. I wasn't sure where else to report this beside the forum. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hi, we are looking into it. thanks. gdf [EDIT the last ones seem to work. I don't know if it was a particular batch or it is your machine] |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 27 Credit: 1,000,618,568 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hmm, OK. I'm waiting to get my new daily quota to see if it continues to blow up. If there is any additional information or troubleshooting you want me to try, please let me know...happy to do it. |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 08 Posts: 87 Credit: 1,248,879,715 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My 9600gso / linux box started getting mostly errors this week as well. This machine was getting an error every month or two before this weeks problems. The wu's don't appear to be beta ( 325-GIANNI_DOPd-2-25-RND0623 ) and are finished by someone else. I updated to the latest greatest cuda driver today so will see if that helps. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra