Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
New driver: 190.62 WHQL
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post at Guru3D.com here, with links to files for XP32, Vista/7 32 and 64. It shouldn't be too long until they appear on nVidias site. Anyone feel brave enough to try them? An interesting side note: in post 24 a user complains that all 190 series drivers are switching clock speeds in an uncontrolled way on his system with Win 7 and a GTX 285. In games as well as if its just sitting on the desktop. This sounds similar to what PoorBoy and others have been reporting. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have 2 GTX 260s. One with 216 shaders is happy with 190.38. The other with 192 shaders was never happy with anything except 182.xx so was on F@H. I have installed 190.62 on the 192 260 and ran OCCT for awhile and looked better than ever did, no artifacts or driver resets. So it has some GPUGrid WUs and we will see what happens. Fingers crossed. Vista 64 and Boinc 6.6.36 on both. |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1st one errored out. Back to F@H for this card. :-( |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 09 Posts: 14 Credit: 28,617,272 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seems likely for me too.... the combination of 190.62, 6.6.38, and 260 (192's) has completed 2 out of todays allotment of wu's the rest all errored out |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
First WU (73-KASHIF_HIVPR) on new GTX 260 and 190.62, BOINC v6.10.0 finished A-OK. |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,174,624,885 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Post at Guru3D.com here, with links to files for XP32, Vista/7 32 and 64. It shouldn't be too long until they appear on nVidias site. Anyone feel brave enough to try them? I did get 3 260 Cards back Friday on a RMA and put 2 in 1 Box, within minutes 1 Wu erred & when I checked 1 of the Cards had reset it's self to a lower clock speed. I reset it but when I checked later 1 or 2 more Wu's had erred too so I just switched back to Collatz on that Box & it's been running fine since. I'm going to try the 190.62 Drivers & a few more Grid Wu's later on it but I'm not expecting any miracles at this point. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
First WU (73-KASHIF_HIVPR) on new GTX 260 and 190.62, BOINC v6.10.0 finished A-OK. Four completed out of 4 now, v190.62 is working fine here. http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=48008 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,174,624,885 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The 190.62's didn't do anything for me, I tried them on 2 of the Cards I got back on as RMA replacements. 1 of the Cards wouldn't run the Wu's for more than a minute or two before erring the Wu. The other card ran for awhile & then erred & reset itself to a lower clock speed or just the opposite by resetting & then erring the Wu. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Poorboy, what brand are the bad cards? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did get 3 260 Cards back Friday on a RMA and put 2 in 1 Box, within minutes 1 Wu erred... I don't want to sound arrogant.. but this is just what I expected :/ MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Poorboy, what brand are the bad cards? 10 bucks says EVGA! |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,174,624,885 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1 was a EVGA & 4 were BFG's, still waiting for 2 RMA'ed BFG's, all the cards run the Collatz Wu's okay so that's what I'm running on them for now. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Poorboy, could you try to generate some errors on one machine with a 190 drivers so that we can look at the problem. gdf |
(_KoDAk_)Send message Joined: 18 Oct 08 Posts: 43 Credit: 6,924,807 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
ZydorSend message Joined: 8 Feb 09 Posts: 252 Credit: 1,309,451 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have a 9800GTX+ running ok under 190.62 - at least it is now. GPUGRID stresses the hardware much more than other CUDA projects, you can and do get the situation where other WUs that stress the hardware less, run, and GPUGRID's dont. It often occurs when the driver is corrupted. Deinstall 190.62 via windows, reboot into safe mode, run Guru3D's Driver Sweeper and get rid of all the old driver bits you will find there, reboot (it will go into 640 mode - thats fine), then reinstall 190.62. There is yet another example of this kind of corruption over on the number crunching forum - in that case it was SETI CUDA running, and GPUGRID didnt. Regards Zy |
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Today I lost 2 WUs on my GTX295 after a emergency shutdown. The card runs at 95°C (normal is 68-72°C) and 100% fan speed (normal is 55%). After rebooting the next WU runs fine, like all the other WUs since installing the 190.63. The error was in line 66 (Mersenne Twister) in this WU 1179359 The other core had a fft_data_swizzle_in error in line 78 1178552 Under this circumstands (card is running hot) it looks difficult to run GPUGrid without babysitting. Such a card is not a cheap card :(
|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can you be sure the card reached this temperature due to GPU-Grid? I don't think they changed their algorithm that drastically. Heating a chip up that much more would require an enormous increase in code efficiency (granted you don't start running useless loops). Could it be that the fan control software failed to set the fan to 100% due to some hickup? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Mar 09 Posts: 159 Credit: 13,639,818 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i'm going to say that the auto fan did auto adjust to the temp. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's what the software reported. But is it true? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra