Increase in queue, from 2 WUs to 6?

Author	Message
tomba Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 12497 - Posted: 14 Sep 2009, 6:05:34 UTC - in response to Message 12450. This WU was calculated within 48 hours (from 9 Sep 2009 12:48:58 UTC to 10 Sep 2009 14:32:46 UTC) and received no bonus 25%! What went wrong? Me too. I'm #3 in this WU, which I returned in 35 hours... Tom ID: 12497 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

poppageek Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 12709 - Posted: 24 Sep 2009, 10:04:07 UTC Since Windows update a few days ago I am now back to getting 2 WUs at a time as before. :-) ID: 12709 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Apr 09 Posts: 503 Credit: 769,991,668 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 12790 - Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 12:42:19 UTC My 9800 GT has gotten only one at a time since I set the queue size to less than the time needed to complete the average workunit. ID: 12790 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Otis11 Send message Joined: 2 Aug 09 Posts: 21 Credit: 197,088,189 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 13183 - Posted: 15 Oct 2009, 19:43:16 UTC - in response to Message 12709. I was down to 2 WUs at a time on my 260, but now I'm getting 10 at a time again, and so am not getting the turn around required for the bonus. Is there anything I can do to make it get fewer WUs? ID: 13183 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 9 Jun 08 Posts: 1050 Credit: 37,321,185 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 13184 - Posted: 16 Oct 2009, 9:31:51 UTC - in response to Message 13183. I was down to 2 WUs at a time on my 260, but now I'm getting 10 at a time again, and so am not getting the turn around required for the bonus. Is there anything I can do to make it get fewer WUs? Decrease your cache setting. Usually anything over 1 to 1.5 days is a waste of time in that if you have a good set of attached projects the only reason to have a larger cache is to try to force BOINC to get more work from an "unreliable" project. Basically, the point is to bridge the gap if you have an outage of your ISP ... ID: 13184 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote