Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Full-atom ...is not available for your type of computer.
Author | Message |
---|---|
I've run 45 tasks now without error, or any other problems. Last night I started getting this appear in BOINC manager running 6.4.2. 12/12/2008 08:23:55|GPUGRID|Message from server: No work sent So, last night I upgraded to 6.4.5 to see if this would fix the problem, but I'm still getting the same messages. I'm running Win XP Pro 32-bit, Q9450 @3.4GHz, GTX 260 OC, WUs take a little under 6hrs, I usually complete 2 or 3 a day. I still have one task running which should complete in ~1hr. Hopefully it will give me another when this one finishes. I'll keep you posted. | |
ID: 4262 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm getting this as well across a couple of hosts. I did have some odd DCF values which now seem to have started to rectify. | |
ID: 4263 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm getting this as well across a couple of hosts. I did have some odd DCF values which now seem to have started to rectify. Great, thanks Burdett. I manually suspended all other work, reduced cache to 0.2 days and manually updated GPUgrid. I then got another task. I can safely go off to work for a few hours now although, I hope I don't have to do this every time I need a new WU. Mark | |
ID: 4264 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
...... under 6 hours on that Black Edition - that's good going. | |
ID: 4265 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
...... under 6 hours on that Black Edition - that's good going. Think I average around 5.85hrs although the last one ran to 6.4hrs. 700MHz core linked to shader @1475MHz, 1200MHz memory clock. Only problem is they don't sell them anymore, so I can't get a pair ;) | |
ID: 4266 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
.... you sure? I bought a second at eBuyer last week - although they don't have any at the moment - Dabs are showing them in stock although at £252 (ouch). Great cards. | |
ID: 4267 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks, Burdett, for the tip. 12.12.2008 13:46:52|GPUGRID|Message from server: No work sent 12.12.2008 13:46:52|GPUGRID|Message from server: (won't finish in time) BOINC runs 99.8% of time, computation enabled 100.0% of that When I suspend the cpu-bound project and keep the first GPUGRID workunit running, then I receive a second workunit from GPUGRID and after that was received I'm getting the usual message again that the per-cpu-limit was reached: 12.12.2008 13:52:53|GPUGRID|Message from server: No work sent 12.12.2008 13:52:53|GPUGRID|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 1 tasks) After receiving two GPUGRID workunits and restarting the cpu-bound project again - funny enough - I'm still getting the message about reaching the per-cpu-limit without any ~24 hrs. polling delay. Well, now crunching two ABC and one GPUGRID unit again, for the time being. Seems the project team changed something on the server side, so just for the records: "It does not work well, could you please take a look again, folks?" Thank you. Regards Alex | |
ID: 4268 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 4269 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The server should be now ignoring dcf for the time being. | |
ID: 4271 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The server should be now ignoring dcf for the time being. OK It has started to drop from the 100. Last check shows DCF at 99.011805. I will leave my host 6133 untouched, so as it can be monitored to see if it corrects back to near 1. Although it will be slow as it takes 16 hours per task. I will check again before I leave on vacation, in about 5 days, then it has 10 days to run untouched. | |
ID: 4273 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
What is now the estimated time when a Wu start? | |
ID: 4274 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
On my i7 with 2x260's estimated time at download now shows as 259 hours. This has 'dropped' from 278 hours over the past 5 or 6 WUs returned. If this is the pace of correction by WU return then this isn't going to rectify anytime soon - and this particular host normally returns 7 or 8 WUs a day. | |
ID: 4277 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
| |
ID: 4278 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Do not do this if you are not comfortable editing xml. Any errors may trash your Boinc installation - Use at your own risk! | |
ID: 4281 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Tried it on one host - got the estimated time down to about 14 hours - which I thought seemed a reasonable start time to let it correct/refine itself from .... subsequent requests for work are now greeted with the 'no work for your tye of computer and work won't finish in time' message as above. | |
ID: 4286 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
.... take it all back. After a couple of false starts work does again flow. Thanks Nightlord - great tip. | |
ID: 4287 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
.... take it all back. After a couple of false starts work does again flow. Thanks Nightlord - great tip. Yes, thanks Nightlord, it worked a treat. Took me a few attempts to get it down to a reasonable level. Now estimated time is at 10.5hrs. I'll leave it there for now and see how it goes. Mark As previously stated: anyone not confident with editing the client_state.xml, please make sure that you know what you are doing before attempting this. | |
ID: 4288 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
.... subsequent requests for work are now greeted with the 'no work for your tye of computer and work won't finish in time' message as above. I've noticed that too. The problem seems to be that BOINC treats GPU like any other project when it is working out its work buffer. To see this for yourself take a computer running just one project (not GPU) and check the work buffer in the project tab on Boincview. Now connect GPU to that computer. The work buffer will double (assuming the resource share for both projects is the same). The solution (pending any change to BOINC code) is to adjust your maintain enough work parameters down or possiblly fiddle with the resource share (I've not tried that with GPU yet). Phoneman1 | |
ID: 4289 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
.... subsequent requests for work are now greeted with the 'no work for your tye of computer and work won't finish in time' message as above. Phoneman1 that doesn't work either.....manually changing the rdcf got me 2 tasks for the moment but thereafter get the message won't finish in time...I have ample std and ltd to be able to keep a 4 task cache on a quad but until they fix the BOINC client and/or the task est time my boxes will run out of work unless constantly babysat which can't happen....the 24hour back-off time increases the chances of idle time :( | |
ID: 4290 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I've just been fiddling the resource share between two projects - looks as if it is just going to shift the problem to the other project. Reducing the mainatin enough work time helped me, but if you only have 4 tasks in your queue there doesn't seem much to cut.....Guess we're still waiting on another Boinc change:-( Phoneman1 | |
ID: 4291 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
........ it was good whilst it lasted - managed to 'fill-up' on WUs .... but the last 2 are now showing estimates of 297hrs.... DCF has gone back up to 28.xxxxxx. | |
ID: 4292 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I've got an empty cache and still cannot get any WU. Does anybody else have this problem? | |
ID: 4294 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have ample std and ltd to be able to keep a 4 task cache on a quad but until they fix the BOINC client and/or the task est time my boxes will run out of work unless constantly babysat which can't happen....the 24hour back-off time increases the chances of idle time :( that 24 hour backoff is (beneath DCF) the biggest problem right now. brilliant idea to put every host not beeing babysitted asleep.. :( | |
ID: 4295 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The same problem here. Without manually updating my PCs are very fast without work. I'm really enthusiastic at the start of the project and purchased 6 big graphic cards, but at the moment I'm really frustrated. Since the version 6.3.19 I can't see any enhancement. It's much more important to feed the 8800GT up to GTX260²/GTX280 with enough work then satisfy the user with the 8500GT. Better 3 WUs in reserve than no WU for a half day on this fast cards. | |
ID: 4296 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am trying to contact Anderson to see how to fix this. | |
ID: 4297 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
........ Thanks GDF. | |
ID: 4298 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, we will differentiate server status. | |
ID: 4299 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's a strange one. | |
ID: 4301 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Probably not. | |
ID: 4302 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have reverted the workunits to values just a bit higher than before the changes. | |
ID: 4303 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Still getting the following message. It then backs off for 24 hrs and my comp goes idle. Lucky for me wu's take a day of crunching, but I'm still idle for 4hrs. DCF has been manually set to 1.0. | |
ID: 4305 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
How much is the estimated time when your wu start? | |
ID: 4308 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Estimated wu time was only 4hrs with a dcf of 1. Things appear to have come good now. I have 4 wu's in the cache. | |
ID: 4337 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
nothing good now - just got a fresh WU - estimated runtime for a 260: 1901 hours. | |
ID: 4338 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
reset project please. | |
ID: 4341 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Full-atom ...is not available for your type of computer.