Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : ACEMD v2.11 (cuda101)

Post to thread Subscribe Sort
Author Message
brian
Send message
Joined: 2 Mar 19
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,055,282
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
wat
Message 56923 - Posted: 29 May 2021 | 23:03:56 UTC

A couple of comments.
GPUGrid is a back up project for me.
I really like the way this works out my GTX1660s
It take a bit over a day to process even on that reasonably current and relatively powerful GPU, not the best for a back up project.
The work done could very well have profound implications.
The credit given out makes a mockery of BOINC credit.
____________

ID: 56923 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2343
Credit: 16,201,255,749
RAC: 851
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 56925 - Posted: 30 May 2021 | 10:58:07 UTC - in response to Message 56923.

A couple of comments on your comments:

GPUGrid is a back up project for me.
GPUGrid has very long workunits with short deadlines for years, lately there are long breaks in work distribution.
Judiging by these characteristics, GPUGrid is not the ideal backup project.

I really like the way this works out my GTX1660s
It take a bit over a day to process even on that reasonably current and relatively powerful GPU...
The GTX 1660s is from the previous generation but it's as much current as it could be because GPUGrid doesn't work on the current generation. But the GTX 1660s never was powerful. "Relatively powerful" = it's the top of the entry level cards.
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1660-super.c3458
GTX 1660 Super 100% RTX 2060 120% RTX 2060 Super 135% RTX 2070 140% RTX 2070 Super 155% RTX 2080 165% RTX 2080 Super 175% RTX 2080 Ti 193%

not the best for a back up project.
The project won't change its characteristics based on the function you designated for it nor the hardware you run it on.

The credit given out makes a mockery of BOINC credit.
The credit is not made for comparing one project to another.
It is intended to serve as the measurement of the relative performance of different hardware within the same project.

ID: 56925 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : ACEMD v2.11 (cuda101)

//