acemdbeta6.41 for windows out

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : acemdbeta6.41 for windows out

Author	Message
GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21590 - Posted: 4 Jul 2011 \| 12:35:26 UTC Last modified: 4 Jul 2011 \| 14:26:06 UTC
	This application should improve the usability of the desktop while running. gdf
	ID: 21590 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21598 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 8:05:24 UTC - in response to Message 21590.
	Any comments? Can we move it to production? gdf
	ID: 21598 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21599 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 10:05:14 UTC - in response to Message 21598.
	ALL Good from where I'm sitting. I think the behavior and setting requirements are almost perfect now - Well done. This will mean a review of performance with and without SWAN_SYNC, but it looks like it does not need to be used/recommended anymore. We will know for sure when we run a few production tasks. Anyone else?
	ID: 21599 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21601 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 10:10:51 UTC - in response to Message 21599.
	ALL Good from where I'm sitting. I think the behavior and setting requirements are almost perfect now - Well done. This will mean a review of performance with and without SWAN_SYNC, but it looks like it does not need to be used/recommended anymore. We will know for sure when we run a few production tasks. Anyone else? Hello: And Linux ... ? Greetings.
	ID: 21601 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21603 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 10:18:25 UTC - in response to Message 21601.
	ALL Good from where I'm sitting. I think the behavior and setting requirements are almost perfect now - Well done. This will mean a review of performance with and without SWAN_SYNC, but it looks like it does not need to be used/recommended anymore. We will know for sure when we run a few production tasks. Anyone else? Hello: And Linux ... ? Greetings. We can look into it later. gdf
	ID: 21603 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Betting Slip Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21607 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 13:14:58 UTC - in response to Message 21604.
	Why don't you just tell us the steps you have taken to resolve priority issues. 1) Have you returned App priority back to below normal? 2) Have you changed thread priority and by how much? 3) Stop treating us like mushrooms and just tell us what you've done. ____________ Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station. Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team - Radio Caroline
	ID: 21607 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21608 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 14:11:35 UTC - in response to Message 21607.
	From one non-mushroom to another, I don't know what else GDF changed in the app, but I did post that the Beta's Base (initial) thread priority was set to 6 and task priority is back to below normal, along with some additional observations about performance with and without SWAN_SYNC: News - New application acemdlong 6.14 is out You will be able to see this yourself using Process Explorer if and when the Beta changes are applied and released.
	ID: 21608 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21609 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 14:30:42 UTC - in response to Message 21608.
	I have just did like E@H. Left the process priority to below normal and increase thread priority to normal. A user here posted what to do, not me. gdf
	ID: 21609 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 1 Apr 09 Posts: 58 Credit: 35,833,978 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21610 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 17:01:30 UTC - in response to Message 21609. Last modified: 5 Jul 2011 \| 17:05:00 UTC
	acemdbeta6.41 for windows out. A bit confusing, I've been running 6.14 as this WU shows: 4 Jul 2011 22:35:14 UTC 5 Jul 2011 12:37:02 UTC Completed and validated 17,652.64 799.64 10,338.26 15,507.38 ACEMD2: GPU molecular dynamics v6.14 (cuda31). On this host But, I'm not into Bêta-Testing, on GPUgrid. If it's more efficient and gives an even higher GPU load, why wait? ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!
	ID: 21610 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21611 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 17:04:17 UTC - in response to Message 21610.
	No, I promoted the beta to production. Let me know if there is any problem. gdf
	ID: 21611 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 1 Apr 09 Posts: 58 Credit: 35,833,978 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21613 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 17:43:35 UTC - in response to Message 21611.
	OK, looking forward to this new build/version and problems/errors, will be reported here. (acemdbeta6.41 for windows, without the 'beta', acemd6.41?) Thank you kindly for this info. ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!
	ID: 21613 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21614 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 18:25:45 UTC - in response to Message 21613.
	As soon as I know that there is no quick problem, I will put a news. gdf
	ID: 21614 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21615 - Posted: 5 Jul 2011 \| 21:14:58 UTC - in response to Message 21614.
	No problems here. Tried suspends, restarts, messed with settings and had SWAN_SYNC on and off... It will be interesting to see how they compare in terms of performance against previous results.
	ID: 21615 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Qazwaplol Send message Joined: 1 May 11 Posts: 5 Credit: 11,472,593 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 21634 - Posted: 7 Jul 2011 \| 16:18:35 UTC - in response to Message 21615. Last modified: 7 Jul 2011 \| 16:21:20 UTC
	It will be interesting to see how they compare in terms of performance against previous results. with a 550 Ti, a Toni task took 15minutes (or 1,3%) longer out of a run time of 19 hours. Which is reasonable. Extrapolated to a year, although comparing only 2 tasks is dodgy, it would mean: 6.14 (above normal) would complete 459 tasks 6.15 (below normal) would complete 453 tasks
	ID: 21634 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : acemdbeta6.41 for windows out

	About	Science	Volunteers	Performance	Forum	Join us	Donate