Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Compute capability 2.1
Author | Message |
---|---|
David asked the following question on the BOINC_alpha mailing list. Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:44:15 -0700 As far as I know the GF104 chip is the only one reporting as compute capability 2.1 and it has 336 shaders (or cuda cores as they now like to call them). Does anyone know about the GF106 and GF108 chips? What do they report for compute capability and how many shaders (or cores per processor)? ____________ BOINC blog | |
ID: 18449 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It will be 2 weeks until we know for sure; release date is 13th Sept for GF106 cards. | |
ID: 18464 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
As SK said: so far the only CC 2.1 chip is the GF104. The other ones are not officially announced yet, which is probably why nVidia didn't give a clear answer. In my eyes that's 14 new reasons to better seperate GPUs and CPUs on Boinc, starting with a Tab for each. I'm not sure that's neccessary. However, what I would like is the ability to assign projects to individual ressources (CPUs, GPUs with different CC, ATI w/o dp etc.) first, including the definition of backup projects. Only after that should ressource share determine the scheduling. IMO that would be enough of a separation. MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
ID: 18472 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm not sure that's necessary. However, what I would like is the ability to assign projects to individual resources (CPUs, GPUs with different CC, ATI w/o dp etc.) first, including the definition of backup projects. Only after that should resource share determine the scheduling. IMO that would be enough of a separation. There are many reasons for a CPU Tab and a separate GPU Tab. For example, it could allow people to keep a 2 or 3 days cache of CPU tasks, and only a 0.05 day cache of GPU tasks. However, the most important thing would be to simplify configurations for the user while providing more control. I like your idea of defining a backup project, it could be very useful. Not sure if a Boinc configuration would allow me to use a GT240 in the same system as a Fermi (assign individual cards to crunch individual tasks), that might be something GPUGrid could think about, or it could require changes in both Boinc and at GPUGrid. It would be nice to be able to click on a task and just tell it to Run; it immediately gets top priority, and whichever task has the lowest stops running - For when you have a task sitting at 99% complete and it stops running, sits in RAM, to allow another task to run. | |
ID: 18473 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
The switching WUs just before one finishes has always bugged me. If BOINC let tasks that have been started finish before switching that would be nice. I understand there are a few really long WU projects (only one comes to mind ... climate prediction) but if you selected that project why wouldn't you want to finish the task? On one hand BOINC espouses "set it and forget it" but then they build rules for task switching that realistically amount to micro managing. | |
ID: 18474 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Compute capability 2.1