Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.15
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 GDFVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications     | |
|
We have been working on optimizing further the application. There is a new Linux application out which is able to actively select the device architecture. | |
ID: 15529 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
Rabinovitch  Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications  | |
|
It still takes the whole CPU core by default. After manual "renice" it looks as it should in my opinion. Will see how about speed in this version. | |
| ID: 15530 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
[AF>Libristes] Dudumomo Send message Joined: 30 Jan 09 Posts: 45 Credit: 425,620,748 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications  | |
|
I've had one: | |
| ID: 15568 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Very good. | |
| ID: 15569 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
STARBASEn  Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
I've got a 6.15 beta in the cache with about 3.5 hours to go on a production WU. Is it preferable to suspend the production WU and run the beta immediately or take it in order? | |
| ID: 15570 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
STARBASEn Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Beta app 6.15 WU f113-TONI_KK20BETA-5-100-RND3209_1 successfully completed but only about 3% faster than an app 6.04 equivalent. CPU usage same as app 6.04. Some improvement anyway. I have another beta waiting to start in about 3 hours. | |
| ID: 15583 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
GDF Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
GTS-250 is based on the G92 GPU core, so it does not gain anything from the new application. Only G200 cores run faster. | |
| ID: 15584 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
[AF>Libristes] Dudumomo Send message Joined: 30 Jan 09 Posts: 45 Credit: 425,620,748 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
I've had one: I had another one. I confirm the speed improvement. (10-12% on my GTX275) | |
| ID: 15587 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
CTAPbIi Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
GTX275, ubuntu 9.10 x64. CPU usage is the same (100%), although no doubt it's faster than 6.04 | |
| ID: 15657 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Rabinovitch Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
It will be very useful even if someone could just provide a way to make GPU apps run at lowest priority (so as CPU apps) without necessarity to modify it's priority manually... | |
| ID: 15676 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
CTAPbIi Send message Joined: 29 Aug 09 Posts: 175 Credit: 259,509,919 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
me personally put GPUGRID at reasonably high priotiry (I wanna get more points, ha-ha). But 100% CPU usage killing my CPU-based POEM project... | |
| ID: 15692 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Rabinovitch Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
That's exactly what I am talking about... | |
| ID: 15703 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
6.15 A69-TONI_KKBETA2-0-100-RND8994_0 task errored out after 10 hours <core_client_version>6.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> # There is 1 device supporting CUDA MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # There is 1 device supporting CUDA # There is 1 device supporting CUDA SWAN : FATAL : Failure executing kernel sync [PmeRealSpace_compute_forces_kernel] [702] acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda: swanlib_nv.cpp:221: void swanRunKernel(const char*, block_config_t, block_config_t, size_t, ...): Assertion `0' failed. SIGABRT: abort called Stack trace (14 frames): ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(boinc_catch_signal+0x4d)[0x46265d] /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f3a67e2a040] /lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x7f3a67e29fb5] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x183)[0x7f3a67e2bbc3] /lib/libc.so.6(__assert_fail+0xe9)[0x7f3a67e22f09] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x46ff13] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x45b6eb] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x458a54] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x4294b0] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda[0x41292c] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sin+0xbf2)[0x407ffa] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sin+0x3b4)[0x4077bc] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x7f3a67e155a6] ../../projects/www.gpugrid.net/acemdbeta_6.15_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu__cuda(sinh+0x51)[0x407519] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> | |
| ID: 15710 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : New beta 6.15
