Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Power limit and impact on clocks and power consumption GTX 980

Author Message
Dave
Send message
Joined: 12 Jun 14
Posts: 12
Credit: 166,790,475
RAC: 0
Level
Ile
Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 39674 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015 | 10:56:42 UTC

Hi there,

I have played around with MSI Afterburner a bit to optimize the performance per Watt ratio of my GTX 980.
I've had my GTX 980 overclocked to about 1310MHz (back from 1400MHz, because the card was running too noisy). Cunrching Noelia WUs I noticed that power draw (and therefore noise) was much higher than with other WUs.

So I reduced the power limit from 105% down to 85%. The result is quite astonishing. Clocks went down to 1265MHz, but fan speed also decreased from 53% to 48%, which is quite noticeable. Also power draw went from 355W down to 310W (system power).

It seems like power limit settings have great influence on VDDC of the GPU. It went from 1,2V down to 1,143-1,156V. This explains the lower power consumption and heat output. Other WUs than Noelia don't stress the GPU that much so clocks can go up again because the TDP limit of 85% is not being reached.

D.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2674
Credit: 910,467,424
RAC: 553,058
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39704 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015 | 19:41:15 UTC

Yes, this is what I call "eco-tuning". Power draw scales aproximately with voltage squared. Close to the maximum boost every single bin of +13 MHz also increases the voltage by a bin of 0.013 V. This may not sound much, but your numbers fit:

Going from 1310 to 1265 MHz means stepping down 3.5 bins. Note the clock speds reported are not always accurate and may include some rounding, since Maxwells core clock can change so quickly. Let's assume 4 bins. This results in a voltage drop from 1.20 V to an expected 1.148 V - just as you're seeing.

Power draw will be reduced by 1.2^2/1.148^2 = 1.093, i.e. 9.3%. There's a further power reduction by 1310/1265 = 3.6% due to the clock frequency decrease. Overall power reduction is expected to be 13.2% (assuming no substantial temperature drop - otherwise there's a small further reduction), for a performance drop less than 3.6%.

Assuming a base power target of your GTX980 of 180 W (pretty usual), with a 105% modifier (189 W) would mean an expected power drop to 167 W, i.e. savings of 22 W. Factoring in a PSU efficiency of 85% (80+ Bronze) the power draw from the wall would be expected to change from 189W/0.85 = 222.4 W to 196.4 W, i.e. savings at the wall of 26 W. Add 1-2 W for the lower GPU fan speed and a few Ws saved from cooler components overall, and we're talking about ~30 W.

Which reasonably close to the 45 W you measured :)

(although realistically I'm probably missing something, since my estimate is off by a factor of 1.5...)

MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Power limit and impact on clocks and power consumption GTX 980